My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/20/1980 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 10/20/1980 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:07:09 PM
Creation date
3/5/2010 10:18:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
10/20/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />,-4 <br /> <br />(e <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />1) Sani tary sewer <br />2) City water <br />3 ) Airport <br />4 ) Grant involvement <br />5) Metro Guideline Costs (Mandated) <br />6) State Guideline Costs (Mandated) <br />7) Legislative lobbying <br /> <br />Inasmuch as the above is probably only a partial list of things we could <br />be involved 'in outside of our general government operation, we are very <br />cognizant that we are goang to be involved in some of the above or more <br />here in the City of Ramsey. We have also learned here in Ramsey that the <br />governing bodies above us don't mind using the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />1) State Aid - We see in this area State Legislators cannot <br />be depended on to see that a proper distribution of these <br />dollars is made. <br /> <br />2) Revenue Sharing - We see a similar situation due to the <br />way the law is written. However, it is the best government <br />grant programs. The tough part of it is our share depends <br />on 'our tax effort. So if ourt.ax effort is low so is our ,- <br />share of' Revenue Sharing. <br /> <br />3) Removal of Aid Funds - We also know that the above legi- <br />slati ve bodies will apply the same percentage when removing <br />their aids even though they didn't give it to us in that <br />manner. <br /> <br />During our preparation of the 1980 budget in 1979, we increased-taxes and <br />the result was received a $.37,912 increase State Aid. However, since the <br />date we received that good news we learned of a short fall in State Revenue <br />which was interpreted back to the City as 8..3% reduction in our forthcoming <br />State Aid for' ,1981 budget year. (The crazy thing about this is the distri- <br />bution of State Aid is not done on an equal percentage basis but the re'- <br />duction of it is as that is fair.) Due to our 'windfall the 8.3% percent <br />reduction didn't hurt Ramsey. However, had we reduced taxes during our <br />1980 budget year for that budget we would have a real dilennna this forth- <br />coming budget year of 1981 as our State Aid increase would have been only <br />$9,478. Further we would have suffered and 8..3% lost due to short fall <br />in State Aid. <br /> <br />The big question is how do we approach the 1981 mill levy. We have talked <br />about this levy limitation problem for several years and 1st year we did <br />-take a small step forward in raising the mill levy and as pointed out above <br />we were luc:kywe did it. This governing body knows the problems that Ramsey <br />is facing with its growth and we know the needs. We also know there is a <br />price tag on these things. Consequently, the dollar base we establish in <br />our 1981 ad valorm tax levy will be dollar base from here on except each <br />year we will be authorized to increase it by eight (8) percent. As an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.