My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/13/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 01/13/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:36:02 PM
Creation date
3/8/2010 10:17:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/13/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Public Hearing <br />P & Z -3- <br />12/15/80 <br /> <br />Mrs. Paul Malarnen, 6210 Green Valley Road, Ramsey, Minnesota <br /> <br />There are no flies in February and Barch, says Mrs. Ma.larnen <br /> <br />Daniel Kortuem, 17711 Vanadium St. N. W., Ramsey, Minnesota <br /> <br />vfuen manure is cleaned out there is no snell. If area is maintained <br />as it was last surrrner I have no objection to it. <br /> <br />Lorraine Blake, Attorney for Ms. Nugent, 6016 Stillwater Road, st. Paul, Minnesota <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Blake says I am the attorney for Ms. Nugent. There has been cattle rn <br />that property for several years. The land has been used as in prior years. <br />She is plarming on getting rid of the pigs as soon as possible. I understand <br />the existence of rules to limi. tit to a: certain n\.1TIber of animals but if v.e <br />carmot get a variance, she has a right to seek her recourse in court and <br />challenge the rule to the right of conpeting uses. The rule exists for <br />your health and safety rules instead of zoning rules. I understand that the <br />pigs \\Bre the min objection and the pigs are being phaSed out. <br /> <br />Mrs. t-la.lanan says\\B haven't had cattle on our place since 1970, if v.e want <br />to go back into cattle business, do \\B have to care back and get a penni t. <br /> <br />Bill Gocx3rich says Yes. The counsel adopted this ordinance a short tlire <br />ago allowing a few animals. but that if you had animals before the ordinance <br />you would not have to get a permit and if you did not have animals then <br />you w::>uld have to get one. <br /> <br />Walter Scroggins ~ 15141 Sunfish LakeBoulevard,RarnSey ~Minrtesota <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It doesn't seem right that I have to carre and get a pennit after being a <br />famer for so many years. <br /> <br />Ma:ry Kortuem, 17711 Vanadium St. N. W.. ~ Rarn.sey;Minriesota <br /> <br />She says if she is allov.ed a variance, next year can she have 50 or 100 or <br />whatever. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson says is the Conditional Use permit is granted, v.e w::>uld <br />specify as to how many she my have. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich says there would be an agree:rrent between Ms. Nugent and the <br />City and it would le to protect everyone but they would not have to ca:re <br />back annually. So long as she uses it prcper1y and there are not a lot <br />of corrplaints by ci tlzens or if the condition should not change she w::>uld <br />not have to carre back and get a new pennit. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson says that she cannot change the conditions and neither can the <br />neighOOrs. Every persons rights areprotected. <br /> <br />Glenn Rychner, 6200 177th Lane N.W., .Rarnsey, Minnesota <br /> <br />I ~uld have an objectirn to her having the cattle. '!hey haven't leen <br />real cooperative. Our land adjoins theirs. We ccnp1ained that there was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.