Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />October 17, 1990 <br />Page 4 <br />earned, charged off to those permits. Knutson suggested the <br />applicant be made aware there will be an administrative <br />charge. <br />Erickson raised <br />indicated Barr <br />Knutson queried <br />be sufficient. <br />cities should <br />projects to the <br />the issue of inspection fees. Schrantz <br />'engineering costs will be considered up front. <br />whether the $500 permit application fees will <br />Through discussion, members concurred the <br />bill their inspection fees for these LRRWMO <br />subdivision, not to the LRRWMO. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Raatikka, that THE <br />LRRWMO HANDLE OUR PERMITTING PROCESS AND FUNDING OF THESE <br />PERMITS THROUGH THE LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT <br />ORGANIZATION FINANCIAL STRUCTURE NOW IN PLACE, WITH REPORTING <br />BY THE MUNICIPALITIES, AND MONIES TO BE HANDLED THROUGH THE <br />LRRWMO DEPUTY TREASURER. IN ADDITION, CITIES SHALL COVER <br />INSPECTION COSTS THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION, AND SHALL NOT BILL <br />THE LRRWMO FOR INSPECTION OF THESE PROJECTS. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />REPORT OF OFFICERS - (Cont.) <br />Raatikka reported the Water Resources Conference is scheduled <br />for the end of October 1990. <br />Schrantz reported he has been selected to serve on the 509 <br />Advisory Canmittee. Members were asked to review the October <br />12, 1990, correspondence he received from Jim Birkholz, <br />Executive Director of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil <br />Resources, and provide imput. Their first meeting has been <br />scheduled for November 1, 1990. <br />Schrantz queried the status of the Watershed Management Plan. <br />Skallman indicated the Board of Water and Soil Resources <br />(BWSR) is waiting to see how the WMO will review permits. <br />The plan revisions have been prepared and are ready to be <br />sent on to BWSR. Schrantz felt the plan should be moved <br />forward toward completion and approval. Skallman stated he <br />could include language in the plan reflecting the proposed <br />permitting process in concept form. <br />Members concurred Skallman should <br />necessary to BWSR for inclusion in <br />to get final approval. Raatikka <br />indicate to BWSR we are waiting <br />plan so we can implement it. As <br />also waiting. <br />send whatever material <br />the LRRWMO plan in order <br />indicated Skallman should <br />for their approval of our <br />9. result, the cities are <br />