Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />August 22, 1990 <br />Page 2 <br />dance, review DNR protected waters review comments, etc. for <br />the period June 3 through June 30, 1990. <br />Weaver noted the Commission is currently overdrawn on the <br />account by approximately $3,200. Skallman explained the <br />various charges'billed. Schrantz felt this $1,336.70 bill <br />should not be fully charged against the Management Plan, but <br />rather needs to be broken out. In answer to Weaver's query, <br />Skallman stated the original agreement to prepare the Water <br />Management Plan, at a cost of $15,000, did not include the <br />cost of going through the process of having the various <br />agencies accept the plan. He indicated the Water Management <br />Plan has been completed and is currently with the Board of <br />Water and Soil Resources. <br />Schrantz noted this board had not figured on permit review, <br />suggesting they charge the applicants for reviewing their <br />permits. It was unknown whether this body had the authority <br />to require such a review charge. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Raatikka, to APPROVE <br />PAYMENT OF THIS $1,336.70 BARR ENGINEERING BILL, REQUESTING <br />THE ENGINEERING FIRM, IN THE FUTURE, TO SEPARATE THE VARIOUS <br />CHARGES FOR THE WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ENGINEERING <br />ACCOUNTS ACCORDINGLY. <br />3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Erickson also presented a bill from the City of Anoka in the <br />amount of $304.33 for the period April 18 through June 6, <br />1990, for secretarial services, supplies, postage, copies, <br />etc. <br />Motion was made by Raatikka, seconded by Schrantz, to APPROVE <br />PAYMENT OF THE $304.33 CITY OF ANOKA BILL. <br />3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />REPORT OF OFFICERS None. <br />CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATIONS <br />The Commission noted the receipt of attorney Curtis Pearson's <br />July 23, 1990, letter, outlining his thoughts of the LRRWMO's <br />July 18, 1990, regular meeting. <br />Weaver concurred with Mr. Pearson's assessments that if this <br />Canission wants to control our future quality of water we <br />had better act before we are overrun by a higher level of <br />government. Schrantz concurred that Mr. Pearson is urging <br />this Commission to become more involved. <br />