Laserfiche WebLink
& <br />LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />July 17, 1991 <br />Page 3 <br />Members concurred the $3,000.00 for the Insurance line item, <br />if needed, should come from the 1991 $3,000.00 carry aver, <br />with the remaining $14,600.00 to be budgeted out of member <br />city dues determined by the proper valuations. <br />Erickson presented a Summary of Permit Fee Applications form <br />which is being used to keep track of permit review deposits <br />and expenditures. <br />Upon discussion of monies to be budgeted for lake monitoring, <br />members concurred, because of budget constraints, tn this b o ar d <br />will have to try to get by with <br />and Water Conservation District is doing for us. However, <br />they concurred the first step is to educate the cities and <br />the public on the importance of water quality through a <br />newsletter. <br />The "Legal" line item included the cost for updating the <br />Joint Powers Agreement. <br />Members concurred a newsletter should be created and budgeted <br />for. Said newsletter shall consist of articles from the <br />LRRWMO members submitted to the Recording Secretary who will, <br />in turn, produce it in final form and provide copies to each <br />member city which will include it in the city's newsletter at <br />its own expense. Schrantz indicated he would prefer the <br />newsletter expense to be identified within the LRRWMO budget. <br />Weaver indicated, reluctantly, we should distribute the total <br />budget to the municipalities and not further draw down on the <br />LRRWMO reserve. Erickson stated at the end of the year we <br />should have approximately $3,000 in savings remaining. <br />Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE <br />THE 1992 BUDGET AS PROPOSED. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Erickson indicated he will make the valuation changes and <br />send the information on to the member cities. <br />Weaver recommended LRRWMO members justify this proposed <br />budget to their City Councils by explaining our legal costs <br />in updating the Joint Powers Agreement, potential costs <br />incurred by future legislation, water quality, and the <br />resulting 509 Committee implementations. <br />