Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />April 17, 1991 <br />Page 10 <br />June meeting, her office will bill you at the rate of $35 or <br />$100 per lake, depending on their ability to find a lake <br />resident monitor. These Seechi Disc readings will only be <br />taken once a month during June, July, August, and September. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Erickson, to APPROVE <br />LRRWMO PARTICIPATION IN THE 1991 LAKE MONITORING PROGRAM FOR <br />ROGERS LAKE, LAKE ITASCA, AND SUNFISH LAKE AT A COST OF $225 <br />PER LAKE PER SEASON, OR A TOTAL COST OF $675. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Skallman recommended LRRWMO participation in the Seechi Disc <br />monitoring program. <br />Ms. Rudolph agreed to send the LRRWMO a copy of all the lakes <br />being monitored. <br />Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Erickson, to <br />APPROVE THE LRRWMO PARTICIPATION IN THE MPCA SEECHI DISC <br />MONITORING PROGRAM, SUBJECT TO LAKE RESIDENT MONITORING <br />PARTICIPATION AT A COST OF $35.00 PER LAKE. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Ms. Rudolph encouraged the board should anyone have questions <br />with regard to erosion sediment control, a permitting <br />decision, or on resource advise, her office will be willing <br />to assist in any way possible. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />Designated Class A and B Water Resources Within the Watershed <br />Skallman reported the various State agencies he contacted <br />requesting comments on the classifications for LRRWMO water <br />resources within the watershed either did not respond or <br />responded in general terms: "Everything is important, no <br />special comments, etc." However, the Fish and Wildlife <br />Division of the Department of Natural Resources recommended <br />Skallman contact the DNR's Natural Heritage Division for <br />relative information on endangered species. He queried the <br />board's wish to get involved in this aspect. Skallman <br />reported, in general, no agency had a problem with the <br />existing LRRWMO water resources classifications. <br />Jankowski indicated one Ramsey Councilmember felt Sunfish <br />Lake should be classified Class B rather than Class A. <br />Skallman stated he has always considered these preliminary <br />classifications and should perhaps be periodically reviewed. <br />However, the LRRWMO does not manage Class B waters any <br />