Laserfiche WebLink
. • h <br />LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />November 19, 1992 <br />Page 7 <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />Water Q uality Records /Maintenance <br />Jankowski indicated this information is not available at this <br />time. <br />Andover's Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan <br />Schrantz reported he mailed the last revisions of Andover's <br />Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan to Skallman recently. <br />Everything should be ready by the December meeting. Andover <br />has been updating the plan at the request of the Coon Creek <br />Watershed. <br />Anoka County SWCD Refund for Seechi Disk Readings <br />Schrantz indicated he called Tony Brough, Anoka County Soil <br />and Water Conservation District (SWCD), about Seechi Disk <br />readings during the 1992 season. Mr. Brough reportedly <br />indicated no one took those readings. As for the $35.00 paid <br />to the SWCD in order to obtain seechi disk readings, Schrantz <br />indicated he would follow up on this matter and report back <br />at a future meeting. <br />Sunny Pond Replacement Agreement <br />Jankowski provided the board with an updated Replacement <br />Agreement for the Sunny Pond development project. He <br />reported there was some concern over the disparity between <br />the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District <br />established wetland boundaries that was affected and what the <br />wetland delineator, hired by the developer, came up with. <br />Jankowski explained the Replacement Agreement is a revision <br />of the previous agreement. <br />Jankowski indicated those interested parties got together, <br />Chris Lord of the Anoka County SWCD, the surveyor, and <br />himself, and went through the surveyor's method of making the <br />delineation. The group reportedly came to an agreement as to <br />the amount of wetland area with only one area of contention: <br />a small darkened area on the photograph where there was a <br />question as to whether it was a wetland or not. Jankowski <br />indicated he wrote a letter to Bruce Sandstrom, dated October <br />30, 1992, MnBWSR, asking his opinion. A response was <br />received in the form of a November 9, 1992, letter from Mr. <br />Sandstrom indicating that the area in question consists of <br />approximately one - fourth acre of Type 1 wetland. He recom- <br />mended that split the difference, suggesting that the LRRWMO <br />require an additional one - eighth acre, or 5,445 square feet, <br />