Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />November 19, 1992 <br />Page 6 <br />He felt this board should take a look at Coon Rapids's plans <br />over there. <br />Zastrow queried whether this board was aware of the City of <br />Anoka's Rum River clean -up effort; no DNR permit was <br />required. Schrantz confirmed it had been discussed, but <br />added that project should be part of Anoka's quarterly <br />report. <br />Upon clarification of what Schrantz expected to be in these <br />quarterly reports, he indicated he wants to know about any <br />significant activity, but not if a city replaces sidewalks. <br />However, he does want to know if a member city is paving a <br />street; but not about an overlay project. Anything that has <br />the potential of affecting our major waterways, wetlands, <br />lakes, etc. he wanted to hear about. He added this board <br />must remain knowledgeable about activities within our <br />jurisdiction; we could end up in court about them. Reports <br />should include anything affecting the surface water <br />management. Schrantz stated even Anoka's street sweeping <br />activities provide a record of responsible activities. <br />Weaver indicated the City of Anoka created a 119 stall <br />surface parking lot for Anoka County's use, taking out three <br />residences in order to accomplish that. Said parking lot <br />will have class five on it until fully completed with addi- <br />tional parking spaces, at which time it will be hard <br />surfaced. Schrantz felt the LRRWMO membership should be <br />aware of this activity. Weaver concurred, adding when those <br />lots were changed from residential to open, hard surface, the <br />runoff eventually will end up in a Class A water. Weaver <br />stated he would be comfortable reporting that type of <br />activity. <br />Zastrow indicated Anoka is more into maintenance than in <br />development any more. Jankowski and Schrantz concurred that <br />when other agencies are involved, such as the Pollution <br />Control Agency, the Department of Natural Resources, etc. we <br />should be made aware of the situation and refer it to the <br />main agency of authority. Schrantz added to some degree, <br />non - permitted activities should still be reported to this <br />board. <br />Motion was made by Schrantz, seconded by Jankowski, that <br />QUARTER REPORTS SHOULD INCLUDE SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES, <br />INCLUDING THOSE NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT. <br />3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />