Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />August 20, 1992 <br />Page 4 <br />Coon Rapids and Ramsey will provide a written second quarter <br />project report at the September meeting. <br />Update on Ramsey project #92 -15 <br />Upon discussion of Ramsey project #92 -15, Department of <br />Natural Resource (DNR) permits #92 -6237 and #92 -6238, a Wood <br />Pond development, a June 15, 1992, communication from <br />Skallman, the LRRWMO Consulting Engineer, was noted which <br />indicated the velocity of the discharge does not meet LRRWMO <br />requirements; and the sedimentation pond is not designed to <br />LRRWMO requirements. Jankowski indicated he would have to <br />discuss this with Pete Raatikka, Hakanson Anderson <br />Engineering, and find out if the necessary changes have been <br />made to the plan. <br />Schrantz directed that this agenda item be held over to the <br />September meeting. <br />DNR Permit #92 -6258, City of Ramsey <br />Jankowski explained the Ramsey proposed project, identified <br />as DNR Permit #92 -6258, involving the placement of approxi- <br />mately 6,000 square feet of fill along the edge of the <br />wetland for the construction of 150th Lane N.W. Mitigation <br />excavation is proposed at 10,000 square feet. Jankowski <br />indicated this project will facilitate a connection between <br />two segments of roadway systems. This wetland is a protected <br />wetland, although not a Class A or B water. <br />Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Ottensman, to <br />INDICATE TO THE DNR LRRWMO APPROVAL OF DNR PERMIT #92 -6258, <br />CONTINGENT ON MITIGATION BEING REQUIRED. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />At this time, Chairman Schrantz made the prearranged tele- <br />phone call to the Consulting Engineer and discussed several <br />issues, among them the need to better detail Barr <br />Engineering's bills, about which Knutson will be contacting <br />him; the LRRWMO's desire to pay the bills being held since <br />the first of this year which first needs to be itemized; the <br />request that Skallman send his communications to the LRRWMO <br />office, not to Chairman Schrantz, whenever possible to allow <br />the Administrative Secretary to distribute copies to the <br />board members for their review prior to the meetings; and the <br />DNR permit applications #92 -6258 and #93 -6019, for which the <br />board received no comment from its Consulting Engineer. <br />Skallman reportedly indicated to Schrantz he has no record of <br />ever receiving information on those two DNR permit <br />applications. <br />