Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Special <br />July 22, 1992 <br />Page 4 <br />etc., weaver <br />collect a fee <br />review process. <br />Meeting Minutes <br />determined that perhaps the LRRWMO should <br />for dewatering permits at the time of the <br />Jankowski and Schrantz indicated they had no problem with the <br />dewatering permit review process as first proposed. Erickson <br />stated dewatering should not be separate; it should be under <br />the full plan review. Weaver noted the minor changes as <br />submitted in writing by Anoka alternate Ray Schultz. The <br />other members felt these suggested changes would be accept- <br />able and would not change the basic intent of the proposed <br />dewatering procedure. <br />Jankowski stated the LRRWMO can try this dewatering permit <br />review procedure for awhile. If we find we are not able to <br />collect for this review process in some way, the policy can <br />be amended later. Erickson stated the success of this <br />procedure will depend on the Consultant Engineer keeping good <br />records. He felt when we actually go through the procedure <br />it will work itself out. Weaver added his only concern is <br />that every cost initiated from a specific community be paid <br />by that community and not come out of our LRRWMO budget. <br />Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schrantz, to ADOPT <br />THE DEWATERING PERMIT REVIEW PROCEDURE AS PROPOSED WITH THE <br />MINOR LANGUAGE CHANGES SUBMITTED BY RAY SCHULTZ. <br />Upon discussion the board concurred the Co <br />will not be doing anything different than <br />when he reviews materials the DNR sends him. <br />different is we will send the bill on to <br />city. The board confirmed its ongoing <br />whoever uses LRRWMO services, pays for them. <br />VOTE: 4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Zsulting Engineer <br />he is doing now <br />The only thing <br />the appropriate <br />philosophy that <br />Schrantz reviewed the updated letter to Anoka County <br />Commissioner Dan Erhart, as approved at the board's July 15, <br />1992, regular meeting, addressing the LRRWMO's policy on <br />banking small amounts of mitigated wetlands for the county. <br />weaver recommended the letter include by what authority this <br />board is assuming responsibility as a Local Unit of <br />Government over the interim regulation of wetlands. <br />Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Weaver, to AMEND THE <br />LETTER TO ANOKA COUNTY COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DAN ERHART, <br />RELATIVE TO THE LRRWMO'S POLICY ON ALLOWING ANOKA COUNTY TO <br />BANK SMALL AMOUNTS OF MITIGATED WETLANDS, UP TO ONE (1) ACRE <br />IN SIZE, TO INDICATE THE BOARD ASSUMES ITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR <br />