Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Special Meeting Minutes <br />June 25, 1992 <br />Page 7 <br />interested in undertaking LRRWMO work, but it should be done <br />as of July 1, 1992, according to statutes. <br />Schrantz asked if the Consulting Engineer would attempt to <br />provide LRRWMO information to the board's office address <br />prior to the meeting date in order for the Administrative <br />Secretary to include the information in packets which are <br />mailed out to board members ten days before each meeting. <br />Faxed information should be sent to Anoka so it can be dealt <br />with by the Administrative Secretary also, either by sending <br />it in the packets or for duplication prior to the meeting. <br />Schrantz asked that he be informed if something is faxed to <br />him. <br />Mr. Dickson stated it is important for the LRRWMO to react <br />promptly. Schrantz concurred, suggesting it may be necessary <br />to set up conference calls. Mr. Dickson agreed adding that <br />the board could then take formal action on conference call <br />issues at its next regular meeting. Schrantz indicated <br />although the board makes every attempt to be efficient and <br />act responsibly, there may be some instances where action, <br />however it is agreed up, must not wait for the next regular, <br />monthly meeting. <br />Weaver plainly stated that this board is not really comfort- <br />able that Barr Engineering's time on LRRWMO matters is being <br />used as efficiently used as it could be. He noted that this <br />board simply does not have extensive financial resources. <br />Weaver urged that consideration be given to assigning as much <br />LRRWMO engineering work as possible to a lesser expensive <br />engineer. Mr. Dickson stated that is an option that can <br />always be considered. Skallman concurred, but added until <br />review procedures are well defined, it would be more costly <br />for the LRRWMO to have some less expensive engineer do the <br />work and continually request assistance from Skallman, who in <br />turn would have to charge the LRRWMO for his time on the <br />LRRWMO matters also. <br />As for the issue of delineating billing charges, Mr. Dickson <br />stated Barr Engineering can easily provide the kind of <br />information required utilizing a worksheet and can attach a <br />copy of it to the billing statement. Schrantz reminded the <br />Barr Engineering representatives that when the charges near <br />and expect to exceed the $450 mark, they should let the <br />appropriate City Engineer know. <br />(Weaver left at 4:37 p.m.) <br />Schultz queried whether Barr Engineering would be able to <br />delineate past bills presently outstanding. Schrantz <br />