Laserfiche WebLink
W I <br />LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />June 17, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />Schultz queried whether this board should review the dewater- <br />ing plans before considering the other aspects of the <br />project. Jankowski stated the City of Ramsey wants to start <br />work next week. <br />Schrantz explained how the City of Andover handles all of its <br />projects whereby it involves the watersheds in the initial <br />planning stages. He suggested the City of Ramsey should get <br />the LRRWMO's approval before the city goes out for bids. <br />Jankowski explained that the procedure used by Ramsey is to <br />give final plat approval before they get bids. However, <br />before a project is allowed to be recorded, the city requires <br />specific assurances. Generally, they authorize and award <br />bids at the same time as the final plat approval is filed. <br />Jankowski stated the LRRWMO would not be signing off on the <br />storm water portion of this project. <br />Schultz expressed concern with the requested dewatering <br />approval in that he feared the LRRWMO is being asked to grant <br />approval as far as the storm water drainage goes, and the <br />board does not know what the storm drainage on that sub- <br />division will be or what comments will come out of it. <br />Jankowski argued that he felt prior LRRWMO approval for that <br />portion of this project at this stage of the project would be <br />a futile effort in that the storm drainage will most likely <br />be modified between considerations of the preliminary and <br />final plat. <br />Schultz cautioned that a storm sewer is the biggest thing <br />that can cause serious conflict to any sanitary sewer <br />vertical alignment. <br />Schrantz stated Andover goes to the watershed for approval of <br />any project's drainage plan. If any changes are made after <br />watershed approval has been granted, the project has to go <br />back to the watershed again. <br />Schultz stated as far as drainage goes, if a project drains <br />into a wetland and requires a siltation pond, those plans <br />will most likely not change, or if so, very little. <br />Schrantz reiterated it is very important to take these types <br />of plans to the watershed for approval as soon as possible. <br />All of the project's permit requests should be run past the <br />appropriate agency before the project is ever started. <br />Jankowski indicated the developers for project #91 -15 were <br />told they must obtain LRRWMO approval. However, he queried <br />whether they need LRRWMO approval of the plat or on just the <br />