My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes from 1992
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
LRRWMO
>
Minutes
>
Minutes from 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 1:31:09 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 10:08:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Lower Rum River Water Management Organization
Document Date
12/17/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />June 17, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />storm drainage. He queried how other cities handle these <br />situations. <br />(Erickson arrived at 9:05 a.m.) <br />Schrantz stated it is simply part of Andover's policy that <br />all plats go through the watershed review process. Erickson <br />indicated he is not involved in that aspect of engineering at <br />Coon Rapids. Schultz stated in Anoka if an extremely minor, <br />older subdivision project came up, it would not make sense to <br />run it through the LRRWMO. <br />Schrantz added that the DNR will be looking at this project <br />and will want approval /comments from the LRRWMO as part of <br />its review process. <br />Schultz addressed the dewatering permit, stating as long as <br />that portion of the project does not affect the wetland level <br />and does not cause problems, other than sedimentation and <br />erosion at the end of the discharge pipe, why should the <br />LRRWMO have a concern with that. Schrantz pointed out that <br />this board does not know where the discharge pipe will be. <br />Schultz queried whether the LRRWMO will require water testing <br />at the point of discharge. Schrantz stated he preferred to <br />leave that aspect up to the DNR. <br />Jankowski agreed perhaps the process is not as simple as it <br />was initially thought to be. Schultz concurred, adding for <br />all this board presently knows, this Ramsey project might be <br />next to an old abandoned fuel tank or the landfill. <br />Schrantz suggested approving permit #91 -15, DNR permit #92- <br />6237, subject to DNR approval, with LRRWMO concerns expressed <br />relative to erosion with the stipulation that the project <br />does not result in flooding anyone's property. <br />Jankowski suggested the LRRWMO set up a review check list on <br />dewatering situations. Erickson queried, and Schrantz <br />confirmed, that the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) will soon <br />be requiring permits for dewatering. Jankowski added the PCA <br />is getting into wetland issues. Schrantz stated the <br />Metropolitan Council is also. <br />Motion was made by Schultz, seconded by Erickson, to APPROVE <br />PERMIT #91 -15, DNR PERMIT #92 -6237, SUBJECT TO LRRWMO CON- <br />CERNS RELATING TO EROSION AND FLOODING AS WELL AS BEING <br />SUBJECT TO THE PROJECT'S RECEIVING DNR APPROVAL. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.