My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10/06/09
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2000's
>
2009
>
10/06/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 12:23:39 PM
Creation date
4/16/2010 8:36:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
10/06/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Miller stated that a public process is not necessary and named the primary things we are <br />looking for: She listed the required services. <br />Commissioner Look felt that a newcomer would not know what input this Council has had <br />numerous times. This is a totally different, less tangible project. He felt there is a lot of benefit <br />that Landfonn can bring to the table. We can go out for 12FQ's - it will take a lot of time and <br />energy and we will probably come back to the same in the end. <br />Chairperson Dehen stated that part of the journey is about the process of being transpazent. We <br />are continuing to expand that scope. We picked one person because he had prior experience. He <br />stated he is about giving everyone an equal chance. This is just asking for proposals to get some <br />idea. <br />Commissioner McGlone stated #1: The first night you saw Landform, you asked why we aren't <br />giving everyone a chance. #2: He asked why someone couldn't get him a price on some land. <br />Why can't we discern what a piece of property is worth -what will the market bear? Anyone <br />coming at us should be able to see what it will cost. He asked for a dashboard. <br />Chairperson Dehen inquired when this will come back to which Ms. Miller replied October 26. <br />Commissioner Look made a motion to go with Landform. <br />Motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Look withdrew his motion. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated that his concern is there aze things Commissioner McGlone asked for <br />that this next case will solve/answer. He understood both arguments. <br />Mr. Lazan, Landfonn, stated he brought forward a dashboard process. He explained the next <br />step would be to work with the Steering Committee. The dashboard and some of these pieces <br />would start right away. Much of what is in this RFQ could be started right away. Things should <br />have been going forwazd in the last two weeks. <br />Chairperson Dehen asked about getting a land price and wondered if staff couldn't do that <br />instead of having to hire a consultant to do that. <br />Ms. Nelson stated we know what land costs are. We aze talking about a dashboazd -that's Mr. <br />Lazan's product. There aze other pro forma out there - we know what land costs are. If someone <br />comes tomorrow we know what we want. What we aze looking at is the broader, long term of <br />the project. Ms. Nelson stated what we have talked about is the ability to have someone from the <br />development world to have this project out there for the brokers -come up with different <br />scenarios about what we could get out of this land -bring it to market and serve as the lead <br />person for this development. That's the piece Mr. Lazan has envisioned for us. <br />Discussion ensued relating to incentive-based compensation. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority /October 6, 2009 <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.