My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/08/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 04/08/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:47:27 PM
Creation date
8/29/2003 11:12:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/08/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council is saying, but some members need more time to get some answers. Councilmember <br />Zimmerman stated that they need to identify funding sources for costs associated w.ith the Town <br />Center. City Administrator Norman noted that staff would not be able to provide those figures in <br />two weeks. Councilmember Elvig stated that the land ownership issues have to be addressed. ' <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmembers Elvig, Zimmerman, Pear~on, <br />and Strommen. Voting No: None. Abstained: Councilmembers Cook and Kurak. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec recessed the regular, meeting of the City Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called the regular meeting of the City Council back to order. <br /> <br />Case #9: <br /> <br />Status Conditional Use Permit for Asphalt Mix Plant; Case of Commercial <br />Asphalt_ ~ <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that at Citizen Input at City Council meetings on <br />October 22 and November 12, 2002, City Council received a complaint on each date from a <br />resident regarding bad odors emanating from the Commercial Asphalt plant located at 14100 <br />Basalt St. N.W. The November 26, 2'002, Council agenda included an extensive case.regarding <br />the history of the plant and its status with respect to current environmental regulations. On <br />November 26, 2002, City Council tabled the matter for 60 days and directed Staff to .gather <br />additional information for Council to use in making a determination regarding how to proceed in <br />the Commercial Asphalt case. Commercial Asphalt plant operations shut down for the season <br />last November. Needless to say, no new complaints have been received at the City since last <br />November. Last November, Mike Caron of Commercial Asphalt made a commitment last <br />November to explore ways to resolve the odor issues. Staff has been in touch with Mr. Caron. <br />Commercial Asphalt has offered up a couple of options. First, the plant was designed in a way <br />that they can raise the stack height another 30-40 feet. Raising the stack height provides more <br />time and area for odors to dissipate before reaching ground level. Another option is that this <br />sp~ring the plant manager will erect a sign at the unloading area establishing that all deliveries <br />must contain the odor mitigating additive and there will be regular monitoring for compliance. <br />In addition, the additive supplier has suggested that the ratio of additiue to asphalt cement should <br />be 1 gallon per truckload, especially for modified asphalt cements, which are more odorous. <br /> <br />Mike Caron, Tiller Corporation, stated that they would like to make a strong effort this spring to <br />make sure the right amount of odor additives are being used, <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired if the additive would eliminate the smell. <br /> <br />Mr. Caron explained that the additive masks the smell as well as eliminating, some of the odor so <br />that the asphalt smell should not be so noticeable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that the City has received 'many complaints from Mr. Hamilton, <br />which concerns her. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if there is health affects because of what is being dispersed and if <br />they mask the smell is there still those health concerns. <br /> <br />City Council/March 11, 2003 <br /> Page 15 of 22 <br /> <br />-141- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.