Laserfiche WebLink
An exampIe of this strategy is for c/ties to educate landowners and developers about access <br />requirements at early stages of the planning process. These early interventions ['educe the <br />confusion, frustration and disagreements between agencies, developers and property owners. <br />Because the passive strategies rely on property owners requesting changes to their property, the <br />changes wiI1 primarily be focused towards future development areas. Areas that have existing <br />safety end, or access problems will be difficult to address through this process and may need to <br />be addressed through more active management strategies. <br /> <br />Active Stra~ <br /> <br />In areas where exisdng safety problems are present and existing access does not conform to the <br />identified concept (generally those with a ranking of two or three), active management stretches <br />will Iikely need to be empIoyed. The County and the Cities should pursue the following active <br />access management strategies in the corr/dor: .. <br /> <br />Adopt and incorporate the access polici'es, and' corr/dor recommendations into <br />transportation plans. <br /> <br />2. Identify and remove unneeded access points in the corridor over the next 12 months. <br /> <br />Pursue roadway improvement projects that focus on achieving long-term safety and. <br />mobility goals throu~ implementation of'the corridor access concept. <br /> <br />Meet periodically to identify [.he most important access issues and potential funding <br />sources for addressing safety, traffic and access problems in the corridor: <br /> <br />SRF Consulting Group, [nc. <br /> <br />- 50. Febrvary 2003 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I -330- <br /> <br /> <br />