Laserfiche WebLink
[= <br /> <br />V. Findings and Recommendations <br /> <br />The County Road 116 Corridor Study was undertaken to evaluate existing and future <br />transportation and access needs along the corridor and to develop a plan that addresses those <br />needs and is supported by affected agencies and stakeholders to better prepare for the growth and' <br />development that will continue to occur. The smdy's findings and recommendations are <br />summarized below. <br /> <br />Study Findings <br /> <br />1. Anoka County is expected to grow at a significant pace, with approXimatety 65,000 new <br /> residents projected over the next 20 years. This growth will increase traffic demand on the <br /> area's transportation facilities, especially east-west traffic flow.. <br /> <br />2. County Road 116'-is currently identified as a B-Minor Arterial.-'7-it serves important east, <br /> west mobility needs, connects communities and it acts as a reliever toTH 10, TH 242 and <br /> CSAH 14. <br /> <br />° <br /> <br />Anoka County lacks continuous east-west corridors. Currently TH 242 and COunty <br />Road 1 I6 (spaced approximately one mile apart) are the only continuous east-west routes <br />in central Anoka County. The next continuous arterial route (CSAH.22 - Viking <br />Boulevard) is approximately 6.75 miles north of County Road 116.. In developed areas, <br />arterial roadways are generally spaced one mile apart. <br /> <br />The importance of County Road 116 to the region and to local communities will continue <br />to increase if a new Dayton/Ramsey Rid'er Crossing is constructed and TH'10 is converted <br />to a limited access freeway. <br /> <br />Traffic volumes on County Road 116 are expected to increase significantly over the next <br />10 years. Traffic volumes are currently between 4,000 and 16,000. Traffic volumes are <br />expected to reach between 15,500 and 24,000 by Year 2025.' <br /> <br />There is no existing transit service in the corri.dor, ff transit service is provided, it is likely <br />to have only a limited impact on operations in the corridor. Typically, suburban transit <br />systems serve two to three percent of peak period trips. However, considerations should <br />be given during the design process for bus stops and pull outs and park-and-ride locations. <br /> <br />Existing safety problems were identified at four locations in the corridor. 'Safety problems <br />can be expected to increase as traffic volumes increase or if additional' accesses are. added. <br /> <br />Currently there are two traffic signals at the key intersections along the. cOrridOr.. As traffic <br />volumes increase, it is likely that the remaining key intersections will meet traffic signal <br />warrants. <br /> <br />A majority of the intersections along the comdor currently function at a poor Level of <br />Service (LOS). In the future, it is anticipated that a majority wilt function at a LOS F- <br />unless the corndor is expanded to four lanes and traffic signals are installed at half-mile <br />intervals. <br /> <br />SRF Consgthing Group, Inc. <br /> <br />- 51 - Febrtta~'y 2003 <br /> <br />-33~ <br /> <br /> <br />