My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/08/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 04/08/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:47:27 PM
Creation date
8/29/2003 11:12:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/08/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Private access should be minimized or eliminated, whenever possible, for safety <br />reasons and to protect mobility along the con-idor. <br /> <br /> Policy: <br /> <br /> · No additionaI direct private or business access should be permitted.. <br /> <br /> · Existing pr/vate residences that have access sl'/ould be limited to one access point <br /> if access from a side street is not feasible. <br /> <br /> · Residences and businesses next to side streets should receive their access from <br /> the side street. <br /> <br /> · Restricting access movements will be considered for access points that cannot be <br /> served by a public street access. <br /> <br />Agencies need to control parcel· sptits along County Road J, 16. The ability to-control <br />access to maintain safety and mobility can be lost when parcels are divided and spilt. <br />This can result in agencies having to provide access to each additional parcel to the <br />detriment of mobility and safety. <br /> <br />Policy: No additional parcel splits should be permitted without alternate access. If <br />additional parcel splits occur, access should be provided from a public side street, or <br />fronzage/bac,kage road. If access from a public side street or frontage/backage road <br />is not feasible, a common access location must be provided to serve all of the <br />parcels. Access easements must be recorded to provide notice ro fi~ture owners of <br />access limitations. <br /> <br />Agencies need to focus development efforts towards providing access at desi~ated <br />full-access locations. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />address (those with alternate access or corner parcels). More difficult access consolidation <br />occurs or when major transportation improvements or investments are made. <br /> <br />Local agencies should review their land use plans and' subdivision ordinances and make <br />appropriate changes to support the proposed access plan. <br /> <br />The proposed access guidelines and access plan should be communicated to local <br />developers and landowners. Copies of access plans should be given to staff that review <br />site plans and meet with developers. <br /> <br /> Policy: Proposed subdivisions adjacent to County Road 116 must be consistent with <br /> the access policies and spacing plan that have been developed. Subdivisions must <br /> provide access to adjacent parcels and provide reasonable frontage or backage <br /> roadways consistent with the intent of this plan. In addition, existing' access <br /> locations that are adjacent to the new subdivisions should be reviewed' for <br /> incorporation into the proposed ptats. <br /> <br />Active access strategies should first be completed on access points that are easiest to <br /> <br />or removal (those without any alternate access) should be implemented as redevelopment <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />-334- <br /> <br />SRF Cons'nixing Group, Inc. <br /> <br />February 2003 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.