Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting <br />February 18, 1'. <br />Page 8 <br />Schrantz also <br />indicates the <br />to reflect the <br />Minutes <br />X93 <br />noted in <br />LRRWMO Joint <br />current law, <br />that letter where Mr. Pearson <br />Powers Agreement must be updated <br />etc. <br />Upon discussion the board expressed its confidence in Mr. <br />Pearson's representation. However, Jankowski stated before <br />the LRRWMO spends $2,500 or $3,000 for an update of the Joint <br />Powers Agreement, he wanted to know to what extent the <br />agreement had to be rewritten in order to warrant such a a <br />sizeable expenditure. <br />Motion was made by Schrantz, seconded by Weaver, to RETAIN <br />CURTIS A. PEARSON AS THE LRRWMO LEGAL CONSULTANT. <br />4 ayes - O nayes. Motion carried. <br />Schrantz reminded city representatives <br />according to the law, each city shoul <br />Management Plan completed. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />to the LRRWMO that, <br />d have its own Water <br />The board noted the receipt of the proposed 1993 Lake Moni- <br />toring Program contract, as prepared by the Anoka County <br />SWCD. The contract proposed to monitor specific lakes within <br />the LRRWMO jurisdiction at a -cost of $200 per lake plus $35 <br />per lake for each seechi disk reading. Mikkonen reminded the <br />board when she last spoke with Tony Brough, SWCD, some time <br />ago regarding the 1992 seechi disk readings, she was informed <br />the information received from said readings, while paid for <br />by the LRRWMO, would be provided directly to the Pollution <br />Control Agency, not the LRRWMO. <br />At the direction of the board, a telephone call was made to <br />Mr. Brough during the meeting to clarify the specific intent <br />of the contract; what the LRRWMO would get for its participa- <br />tion in this program. Mikkonen reported Mr. Brough offered <br />to obtain both lake monitoring and seechi disk readings for a <br />total cost of $200 per lake. Upon further discussion and <br />review of the proposed contract, the board determined it did <br />not wish to be responsible for finding volunteers to take <br />seechi disk readings on the lakes being monitored. It <br />preferred the SWCD assume responsibility for obtaining those <br />readings in whatever manner necessary, either by its finding <br />volunteers or else SWCD employees taking the seechi disk <br />readings themselves. <br />Mikkonen relayed the information, obtained from Mr. Brough <br />during the telephone conversation during this meeting, that <br />