My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes from 1993
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
LRRWMO
>
Minutes
>
Minutes from 1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 1:31:19 PM
Creation date
5/10/2010 9:08:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Lower Rum River Water Management Organization
Document Date
12/16/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />January 21, 1993 <br />Page 5 <br />a budget as small as this he has a concern that even one <br />project with which this board might get involved could eat up <br />our engineering budget and a lot more in a short time. <br />Weaver felt it is good insurance to have a little fiscal room <br />which this budget affords us; even what we do have does not <br />leave much room. Weaver stated he would much prefer to have <br />a budget with some flexibility, especially if we for some <br />reason have to use the LRRWMO legal counsel extensively. <br />Jankowski indicated Weaver had a good point, adding he <br />informed his Budget Committee the LRRWMO is not a tax and <br />spend organization; when, in fact, it tends to be a tax and <br />save organization. He went on to report that the Ramsey City <br />Administrator merely expressed his concern on behalf of the <br />city that if the budget is there, there is sometimes a <br />tendency to spend it. While the Ramsey City Administrator <br />was reportedly assured that this board was not of that <br />nature, a certain trepidation still remained that the <br />possibility exists that any new members to the board may not <br />be of a like nature. Jankowski stated his City Administrator <br />indicated he would rather the LRRWMO go back to the cities if <br />more money is needed. <br />Schrantz felt such a request would be extremely difficult for <br />member cities in that their city budgets are already set. <br />Ottensman noted that the budget for engineering commission <br />meeting attendance was only $1,500 back in 1991; a very <br />insignificant amount. He concurred with the board's previous <br />decision to wait until the second half membership billings go <br />out, at which time the LRRWMO will take a look at how the <br />1992 expenditures finished out. He stated right now it looks <br />to be over budget. However, Ottensman stated, he would be <br />willing to take a second look at the budget at that time. <br />Any immediate action to reduce these budget figures would be <br />premature until we close the books out for fiscal year 1992. <br />Knutson addressed the issue of operating"cash available. He' <br />cautioned that any project which might arise and involve the <br />LRRWMO attorney might take care of that operating cash. <br />Knutson added that the basic reason for increasing member <br />city assessments was to avoid taking money out of reserves. <br />Jankowski queried how big a reserve fund this organization <br />should retain. Knutson stated the unknown costs are an issue <br />this board must consider. <br />Weaver recalled whereby our attorney informed the board that <br />it is not in the business to merely comply with the laws but <br />to make sure ground and surface water is properly managed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.