Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />September 16, 1993 <br />Page 8 <br />many of the concerns Ottensmann expressed, but did not have any additional concerns. <br />Jankowski noted the deadline was August and suggested Pearson be contacted and asked <br />when the legal opinion will be available. <br />Board consensus was reached to request the legal opinion from Pearson for discussion at <br />the October meeting. <br />Water Oualitv Records/Maintenance -Jankowski <br />Jankowski noted he wanted to review what types of LRRWMO water quality records are on <br />file at Barr Engineering. He commented this is probably a winter project and asked that it <br />remain on the agenda as a reminder. <br />Restoration Order: Rosella Sonsteby~re: Cease and Desist Order #15191 <br />Haas reported he spoke with Chris Lord, Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation <br />District, regarding the Restoration Order issued to Rosella Sonsteby and found out that only <br />one point of the restoration has been complied with so the issue will probably go to court. <br />Haas briefly reviewed the project which resulted in the Cease and Desist Order and clarified <br />the DNR officer agrees this is a wetland. <br />Jankowski commented on the DNR functioning as the sole responsible jurisdiction in this <br />matter <br />Board consensus was reached to remove this item from the agenda until further action <br />occurs. <br />DNR and Soil and Water Conservation District Correspondence <br />The Administrative Secretary indicated the LRRWMO is not receiving any letters of <br />compliance from the DNR or Soil and Water Conservation District. Haas agreed they both <br />should send the LRRWMO letters regarding projects. <br />Newsletter Article - Fer ug son <br />Ferguson must yet provide a newsletter article,("Wetland Conservation Act") to be submitted <br />to the four member cities' newsletter. <br />Discussion of BWSR Presented Bankin itieation Format <br />The Administrative Secretary reviewed a worksheet she prepared to keep track of mitigated, <br />banked and accrued mitigated acreage. She explained it will be helpful to have an in-house <br />worksheet to track these items, especially for Anoka County who is able to bank negative <br />mitigation. <br />