Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />July 15, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />$500 fee to be submitted with the application with a refund <br />of the unused portion upon project completion. <br />Beduhn reiterated it does not sound like the project will <br />violate the Wetland Conservation Act. He added the SWCD <br />should be able to delineate the boundary for the Boy Scout <br />Camp so it are aware where the upland ends and wetland <br />begins. The plan sheets show the area upland and where the <br />removed soils will be placed. <br />Mr. Litke went into further detail about the project, stating <br />they plan to enhance the existing nature trail also. By <br />undertaking the proposed project, they hope to increase the <br />number of wild ducks in the area. The cattails would help to <br />protect the young ducks from predators. <br />Weaver indicated the Boy Scout Camp will submit a permit <br />application and proceed as recommended. <br />TREASURER'S REPORT <br />Joint Powers Acreement <br />Weaver stated when the Anoka City Council considered the <br />resolution approving the proposed updated Joint Powers <br />Agreement, a number of concerns were raised. The end result <br />being the resolution was tabled. Weaver went on to request <br />specific explanations of various portions of the proposed <br />Joint Powers Agreement. <br />Page 12, subdivision 8 Weaver reported Council was con- <br />cerned that statement could require the City of Anoka to <br />conduct massive storm sewer relocations. Anoka drains <br />directly to the Rum River. Anoka's City Council feared the <br />long range implications of that subdivision. <br />Pearson's response was there is a real possibility the city <br />may some day be mandated to treat that water before it gets <br />to the river; many communities are facing this. However, he <br />suggested it will have to be done on a regional basis. <br />Pearson predicted this board will get into pollution control <br />in the future. <br />Weaver went on to explain the major concern is that Anoka is <br />a "developed", not a "developing", community. Pearson stated <br />that communities, developers, etc, are mandated to conduct <br />the best management practices, but not if totally and <br />economically impossible. However, he did caution that Anoka, <br />and others, have to start looking at the problem. Pearson <br />indicated he understands the city's fear, but brought to the <br />