Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meetinq Minutes <br />July 15, 1993 <br />Page 4 <br />board's attention the fact that this Subdivision 8 statement <br />has been on the books for twenty years; and no one has paid <br />much attention to it. However, with the current emphasis on <br />water and cleaning up pollution, there will be more and more <br />mandates from the legislature and the Board of Water and Soil <br />Resources (BWSR). <br />Pearson went on to state this legislation does not say Anoka <br />has to spend millions of dollars on changing its existing <br />drainage, but that new development will be required to <br />address those practices. The fact that Anoka is developed <br />does not mean it can continue to do what it is doing forever. <br />Pearson went on to state the intent of the language proposed <br />in this agreement is to give this body more muscle than it <br />has had in the past. <br />Weaver suggested the language "where feasible or practical" <br />be added to Subdivision 8. Pearson reported that other <br />watersheds have studied this language and have instituted <br />variance possibility situations. Some nonconforming situa- <br />tions do exist. However, he cautioned this board will <br />somehow have to keep control of this. <br />Beduhn added that BWSR's policies and rules relating to <br />retrofitting existing situations will have to be addressed in <br />the Water Management Plan update. <br />Pearson went on to state that the federal government recog- <br />nizes the problems municipalities will and are having in <br />complying with many of these property-related mandates. <br />There is legislation being introduced to try to tone this <br />down for further study before they are mandated. The best <br />management practice of the Clean Water Act says you should do <br />everything you can to clean these things up. <br />Weaver stated Anoka wants to comply with these mandates, but <br />it can not afford to spend the amount of money such an update <br />would require; it would be impractical. <br />Beduhn stated these mandates usually apply to redevelopment <br />or if there is a major problem. The city does not neces- <br />sarily have to force itself to take action addressing its <br />direct drainage situation until redevelopment occurs. <br />However, it should look at its opportunities when they arise. <br />Beduhn added it also depends on the quality of the Rum River. <br />If the city can show the river is meeting water quality <br />criteria, it might take some of the pressure off. <br />Pearson stated the rules now in force state when you <br />redevelop the water Management Plan, said plan must contain <br />