Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />July 15, 1993 <br />Page 12 <br />be part of the Water Management Plan update. Jankowski <br />stated our options are limited on how we can handle it. <br />Beduhn stated this board could send. its wetland applications <br />to the Soil and Water Conservation District for review, but <br />that agency would charge this board a fee for its review <br />also. <br />PENDING PROJECTS/PERMIT REVIEWS <br />LRRWMO Application #93-6, Norway Pine Builders, Inc. <br />Beduhn reviewed Applicaton #93-6, Norway Pine Builders, Inc., <br />stating he did not receive enough information to make an <br />accurate recommendation. He reportedly could not tell from <br />the plan sheets if the area filled is wetland, a county <br />ditch, or what. He requested that more information be <br />provided by the applicant. <br />Haas explained the applicant wants to build a driveway to get <br />back to a pole barn. <br />Motion was made by Perry, seconded by Ferguson, to SEND <br />NORWAY PINE BUILDERS, INC. A COPY OF THE LRRWMO CONSULTING <br />ENGINEER'S COMMENTS AND ASR FOR THE INFORMATION REQUESTED. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />LRRWMO Application #93-7, Metropolitan Waste Control <br />Commission <br />Beduhn explained this plan proposes tearing down and <br />regrading the site of the old waste water treatment plant in <br />Anoka. He indicated that water quality would be the biggest <br />concern. The plans reportedly provide for the use of a silt <br />fence and inspections after rainfalls. Beduhn indicated this <br />MWCC plan is in line with state rules. He felt the success <br />of this project will rely on the maintenance of the fences. <br />Beduhn recommended approval with the understanding a City of <br />Anoka representative will check on the project through <br />correspondence with the MWCC and by performing on-site <br />inspections. Schultz stated he would expect the city will <br />make cursory inspections once in awhile. Beduhn went on to <br />state there are no new impervious surface requirements. The <br />city's parking department should be made aware if there is a <br />large amount of parking they may be subject to WMO water <br />quality requirements as far as sedimentation. <br />Schultz confirmed MWCC will be removing all structures. <br />Weaver very briefly explained the project and its purpose. <br />Jankowski queried whether the MWCC will have to dewater to <br />