Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />May 19, 1994 <br />Page 5 <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />Presentation by Bruce Sandstrom ~BWSR~ Requirements for WMO Plans <br />Jankowski explained the LRRWMO has discussed updating the WMO Plan regarding <br />content requirements, cost estimates, etc. Bruce Sandstrom and Jim Haertel, BWSR, were <br />present to address content requirements. <br />Bruce Sandstrom, BWSR, stated they understand the concern of WMOs and do not want <br />to see unnecessary things in the plan so they encourage WMOs to adopt as much as possible <br />by reference and to focus on implementation issues. He explained that there are several <br />unknowns since the Met Council is considering setting pollutant load goals for WMOs and <br />have sent out inquiries on cost estimates for monitoring. <br />Sandstrom stated the LRRWMO needs to consider what their role will be, active or inactive, <br />and whether they will be working with wetland banking or leaving it up to individual <br />members. <br />Schultz expressed concern that some organizations are not responsive to the electorate and <br />hand down mandates which result in spending exorbitant dollars to meet their goals. He <br />reviewed costs related with street sweeping to meet Met Council's goals for pollution levels. <br />Sandstrom explained that if you read the street sweeping regulations carefully, it is not <br />mandated but the city has to assess the need for street sweeping. <br />Sandstrom stated the WMO needs to address issues such as this as well as goals and policies. <br />He explained that some cities "tie" themselves down too tightly with setting regulations in <br />the code and suggested that the LRRWMO allow some flexibility. <br />Beduhn stated that Andover has an approved plan and Coon Rapids has adopted provisions <br />of the LRRWMO Plan by ordinance. Currently, Ramsey and Anoka still need to approve <br />plans. He explained the LRRWMO has discussed Plan content and the option of deferring <br />most of the detailed evaluation to the local Plan. He asked how much public input needs <br />to be received and how intensive the entire process needs to be. <br />Sandstrom explained there are several options. The WMO can assess functions of wetlands <br />by establishing a process using acase-by-case basis, laying out detailed plans for doing that <br />kind of evaluation, or doing it as part of the planning process for the entire watershed. The <br />minimum would be to provide methodology to assign functions on values of the wetland, or <br />to adopt what is in the WACA Conservation Rules. Sandstrom explained the rules are kind <br />of flexible in that regard but the LRRWMO has to assess problems and set goals and <br />policies first, which is what drives the cost. <br />Sandstrom stated he felt the estimated $30,000 for a plan is probably at the lower end of <br />what WMOs will be spending. He explained the rules are quite flexible; they set out a <br />