Minutes from 1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

LRRWMO Meeting Minutes February 15, 1996 • Page 6 Jankowski noted condition #9 and questioned if the City has a development plan showing those elevations. Haas stated they have not completed the preliminary plan process at this time since they wanted to first complete this process. Weaver asked if this property is within MUSA. Haas clarified it is not and contains 2.5 acre lots. Haas reviewed the process used in Andover and progress being made with their MUSA request without implementing a Liveable Communities Act. Motion by Weaver, seconded by Ottensmann, to approve the Wetland Replacement Plan for Indian Meadows 4th Addition, Andover, subject to the following conditions: 1. The erosion control measures shown on the plans must be installed prior to the commencement of land alteration and be maintained until all areas altered on the site have been restored. 2. The applicant should be advised that a NPDES Construction permit will also be required from the MPCA. 3. At the entryways onto the site, rock filter dikes being a minimum of two feet in height and having a maximum side slopes of four to one must be constructed. These rock filter • dikes will provide an erosion control facility and also enable construction traffic to enter the site. These rock filter dikes must be continually maintained during the construction phase of the project. 4. Street sweeping must be undertaken and completed on an as needed basis. 5. Upon completion of construction and restoration of disturbed areas, the permit applicant is responsible for the removal of all erosion control measures installed throughout the site. 6. The outlets for the water quality basins must be designed to provide skimming of floatable materials. 7. The water quality basins must be constructed at the initial stages of construction and be functional during the grading portion of the project. 8. Sufficient pipe and surface overflow capacity must be provided between Lots 6-8 and 11-12, Block 4 and Lots 2-3, Block 5 to convey runoff from the 100-year frequency storm event. At these locations, the low points in the roadways function the same as a stormwater detention basin and should be designed accordingly. 9. The low floor elevation of the structures on Lots 1-12, Block 4 and Lots 1-6, Block 5 must be a minimum of one foot above the calculated 100.year frequency flood elevation of the drainage ditch through the site. It is recommended that a covenant be placed on the title to these properties, stating the minimum allowable floor elevation. 10. It is recommended that a covenant be placed on the title to the properties referenced in item 9, stating that certification be submitted to the WHO stating that the low floor elevation has been constructed a minimum of one foot above the 100-year frequency • elevation of the drainage ditch. 11. Where proposed Eldorado Drive crosses the existing drainage ditch, the surface overflow elevation must be a minimum of one foot lower than the low floor elevation