My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes from 1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
LRRWMO
>
Minutes
>
Minutes from 1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 1:31:49 PM
Creation date
5/10/2010 11:48:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Lower Rum River Water Management Organization
Document Date
12/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes • <br />August 15, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />Haas questioned the billing dates from Kennedy & Graven which indicates it covers services from <br />October of 1995 through June of 1996. He asked if this will impact the 1995 audit, since some of <br />the costs are from that time period. Schultz suggested Knutson be asked to verify the correct <br />accounting of this invoice. <br />Ferguson noted the Barr Engineering invoice for Plan review indicates they overspent the contract <br />amount but aze abiding by the not-to-exceed amount and billing for only $2,000. <br />Motion was made by Ferguson, seconded by Haas, to authorize payment to Timesaver for <br />$358.82 and Barr Engineering for $464.75 and $2,000, City of Anoka for $88.52, and Kennedy <br />& Graven for $237.15. Vote: 3 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried. <br />Consideration of the SEH invoices was not undertaken since it had been previously determined that <br />only 90% of the contract amount will be paid prior to Plan approval. <br />Discuss Draft 1997 Budeet <br />Weaver presented the draft 1997 budget which "holds the line" at the 1996 assessment level. He • <br />noted the reserve in February of 1996 was $33,767 and the projection indicates an anticipated reserve <br />in February of 1997 of $40,267. After a $2,100 deficit in 1997, a reserve is anticipated of $3 8,167 <br />as of February 1, 1998. <br />Ferguson asked if the anticipated reserve is needed in the budget to address issues that may change <br />or if, perhaps, it should be somewhat reduced. Weaver stated he is not comfortable with lazge <br />reserves, but there may be, on the horizon, legislative actions which require expenditures by the <br />L]tRWMO. He emphasized the LRRWMO has been very frugal with expenditures, especially for <br />legal services. <br />Haas asked if this draft budget incorporates activities projected in the Plan Update. Ferguson <br />reviewed the implementation chart and estimated an expenditure in 1997 for Plan activities of <br />approximately $1,000 for public involvement and to review the permit process. <br />Schultz noted the LRRWMO received a grant of $15,600 which requires a match of funds by the <br />LRRWMO. Weaver asked if the matching funds aze outside of anticipated Plan Update costs. It was <br />noted that the most recent grant of $15,600 is for implementation of the Plan. <br />Weaver agreed that the grant and Plan projects may impact the draft 1997 budget. He pointed out <br />the proposed assessments for member cities is the same as 1996 assessments. <br />Jankowski arrived at 9:21 a.m. • <br />Jankowski noted the anticipated February, 1998, reserve of $38,167 and asked if the scheduled <br />implementation costs aze that great. A review ensued of anticipated implementation costs for 1997. <br />Jankowski questioned the rationale for maintaining a reserve of this high level. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.