Laserfiche WebLink
• LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />August 15, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />Weaver asked ifthe reserve should be maintained for one more year. Ferguson pointed. out no funds <br />aze included for Plan review and questioned whether the Plan will be approved by the end of 1997. <br />Jankowski agreed it could take another year for the Plan to be approved but he supports somewhat <br />of a reduction of the reserve balance. <br />Weaver stated he doubts that there is any other city department that is planning to operate in 1997 <br />at the same level as they did in 1996. He noted that justification to maintain a balance is based on <br />Plan requirements and what maybe required by the legislature in the near future. Ferguson concurred <br />and noted the $15,600 grant may require a match by the LRRWMO. <br />Jankowski agreed the budget may not be questioned if assessments aze maintained, but pointed out <br />that it is only anticipated that an additional $2,000 would be needed for Plan implementation projects. <br />Ferguson suggested that more be determined about the $15,600 grant and if a reimbursement will be <br />required if the LRRWMO does not spend $15,600 for Plan implementation in 1997. Schultz <br />suggested that grant funds be identified separately within the budget. All agreed. <br />• Weaver asked what type of documentation is required from the LRRWMO on the grant. Lobermeier <br />stated he believes the information already submitted to receive the grant is sufficient and no additional <br />documentation is required since the grant also allows recouping costs already spent on the Plan. He <br />reviewed the types of costs and categories which aze contained within this matching grant. <br />Lobermeier stated the cost for the SEH Plan preparation is only one component of the categories. <br />Other costs include the review by Barr Engineering, LRRWMO members, in-kind services, etc. <br />Weaver noted a deficit budget is being projected and he hopes the LRRWMO allows this. level of <br />budget to remain for one more yeaz. He pointed out the lazge project cost anticipated by the City of <br />Anoka for the Rum River dam which also serves the member cities. <br />Ferguson suggested a slightly lazger deficit be budgeted to reflect a slight decrease in assessments and <br />the projected balance. He also suggested costs be budgeted for the Plan revision. and implementation <br />projects. <br />Jankowski stated this would be difficult to justify since the Plan has aready been budgeted for plus <br />grants have been received. Also, the LRRWMO has not agreed to pay SEH any more than the <br />contract amount. Jankowski asked what is a reasonable reserve for this organization. <br />Weaver pointed out that the method of handling permit review has resulted in the positive outcome <br />of having developers cover their own costs. He asked how the: LRRWMO would handle a lazge cost <br />. item mandated from the legislature if there aze no reserves to fall back on. Jankowsl commented <br />that the State may also provide grant funds to undertake such a mandate: Ferguson stated usually <br />a mandate of this type takes a while to become effective and if it were to happen, the. assessments to <br />member cities will have to be increased. <br />