Minutes from 1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• LRRWMO Meeting Minutes April 18, 1996 Page 3 Weaver stated no more than the amount requested should be released with the indication that additional funds will not be paid out until the Plan has been completed. Haas concurred. Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Haas, to authorize payment to Timesaver for $190.78, Barr Engineering for $473.75, and SEH to an extent not to exceed 90% of the total contract. Vote: 4 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried. REVIEW PLAN UPDATE -IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM -SEH Mark Lobermeier, SEH, presented a memorandum detailing the language changes requested at the March meeting. Consensus was reached to revise Table 28, Goal. Jankowski suggested the OHW s be included on the maps. Lobermeier stated if the DNR has established the OHW, it is part of the data base. With regazd to the action plan summary, Weaver indicated support for the use of the term "strategy" which clearly identified this is a plan for budgeting~urposes only. • Schultz questioned the term "outside sources" and suggested it be better defined. Consensus was reached to use "other sources". Jankowski noted there will be a need to annually review the CIP to assure it is pertinent. Lobermeier suggested this be part of the annual budget review process. The LRRWMO then reviewed the Capital Improvement/ActionPlan section and cost tables. Weaver indicated support for the inclusion of a disclaimer indicating the availability of funding is required to complete items indicated as future projects. The LRRWMO reviewed the letter of comment received from Rosella Sonsteby. Lobermeier noted most of the comments relate directly to the Sonsteby property and asked if the Plan addresses perceived problems. It was noted that most issues would defer to the local plan adopted by Andover. Lobermeier reviewed the timing process for public hearing, agency submittal and review, and final approval. He suggested the document be approved by member city councils prior to submittal to agencies. Weaver noted this is a major document with potential for significant impact over a period of time and Council review and approval is vital. Haas suggested the Council review take place prior to the May 16, 1996 LRRWMO meeting. • Jankowski concurred. Weaver suggested that each member city determine, individually, whether they want to provide copies for Council members. All agreed and requested Lobermeier provide an executive summary for use by the Council with the intention that a full copy of the document would be available at City Hall should any councilmember desire to review it in more detail.