Minutes from 1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• LRRWMO Meeting Minutes November 21, 1996 Page 4 Third Quarter 1996 Reports Andover Anoka Coon Ravids & Ramsev The Anoka Third Quarter 1996 Report was received for review as well as letters requesting the release of escrow monies for Regency Wood Apartments Permit #92-05; Tower Pond Addition Permit #92-06; Mineral Pond 6th Addition Permit #92-08; Reliant Engineering & Manufacturing Permit #94-12; Stonehaven Addition Permit #95-03; AEP Phase 3 Permit #95-05; Central Power Distribution Permit #95-10; and Wisconsin Magneto, Inc. Permit #95-20. Weaver reviewed the permit fees which had akeady been returned. It was noted that fund balances for all of these permits had previously been approved for reimbursement, except for Regency Wood Apartments. Motion by Weaver, seconded by Ferguson, to accept the Anoka Third Quarter 1996 Report and return of fund balance as requested by the City of Anoka for Regency Wood Apartments, Permit #92-05. Vote: 4 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried. Haas asked if some of the lazger projects should be reviewed/confinned by Ban Engineering, or if the City can complete the inspection and speak for the LRRWMO that the project meets Plan . requirements. He expressed concern regarding the potential of liability should the City recommend closing the permit and releasing funds but the pond, etc. is not constructed to meet Plan requirements. Haas stated he has used Ban Engineering for the final inspection and to prepaze documentation to assure and verify the project is completed to standazds. Ferguson stated he is comfortable with allowing the City Engineer to make the determination on whether a final inspection should be handled by Ban Engineering. Weaver asked if, with a large project such as Regency Apartments or Stonehaven Addition, where consulting engineers aze involved on behalf of the City, it is prudent or cost effective to bring Ban __ _ Engineering in for aninspection - or if it could be completed by the consulting engineer. Jankowski noted that if a WMO permit is required, Barr Engineering will already be familiar with the project. Ferguson stated he believes this point merits consideration but he does not believe a formal policy needs to be drafted since the City Engineer has a sense of the project and whether or not it is sensitive. Haas submitted and reviewed the 1996 Third Quazter Report for Andover which also included projects which did not require LRRWMO permits. Motion by Ferguson, seconded by Weaver, to accept the 1996 Third Quarter Report for Andover. Vote: 4 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried. • Motion by Weaver, seconded by Ferguson, to transfer the remaining permit escrow from Permit #94-7 to Permit #93-6 to cover the $118.18 deficit and to then return the remaining escrow to Donovan Robarge. Vote: 4 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried.