Minutes from 1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• LRRWMO Meeting Minutes April 18, 1996 Page 15 7. The low floor elevation of structures to be located on Lots 16-18, Block 1, adjacent to the wetland area must be established a minimum of one foot above the calculated 100- year frequency flood elevation of this facility. 8. The LRRWMO, being the LGU administering the requirements of the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act, requires that the developer provide verification, provided either by the Anoka Conservation District or the engineering advisor to the LRRWMO, of the wetland limits on the site, as delineated by the developer's consultant. Vote: 4 ayes - 0 nays. Motion carried. PLAN UPDATE The LRRWMO requested Barr Engineering provide a cost estimate to review and provide recommendations on the Plan Update. Obermeyer stated he will review the plan and provide a written estimate. SEH Request for Contract Amendment -Continued • The LRRWMO reviewed the letter provided by SEH detailing work remaining to be completed on the Plan update and their request for an additional $4,600 to complete the Plan. It was noted this would increase the total Plan update cost from $26,400 to $31,000. Schultz noted the cost of other watersheds is not an issue of consideration and if SEH believes there was an inconsistency or need for revisions in the current Plan which are over and above what they said they would do, they should "spell them out". Ferguson and Jankowski noted the only additional work may have been the informational meeting. The SEH proposal was reviewed which indicated $3,000 was included in the original bid amount for the cost of Board and community review. Motion by Ferguson, seconded by Weaver, to notify SEH that based on the information provided, the LRRWMO does not see any areas of expanded scope for work related to the Plan Update and the contract was awarded at anot-to-exceed price. Schultz noted this is anot-to-exceed figure which included certain parameters and the LRRWMO has taken no action to exceed those parameters. Haas agreed and noted the Statutes clearly spelled out what was required. • Weaver noted the LRRWMO has not requested any additional information beyond what had been presented in the RFP except to request a clarification, and SEH has dictated the pace, not the LRRWMO, so there is no justification for the increase. Vote: 4 ayes - 0 nays. Motion carried.