Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. <br />FAA Advisory Circular (AC 150/300 - 4B, Change 8) further identifies <br />sanitary landfills as airport hazards. An airport hazard has a <br />substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use of the <br />airport by aircraft and upon the safety of persons and property located <br />on or near the airport. An airport hazard must be removed. <br />The narrative in the EID correctly quotes FAA guidance concerning <br />sanitary landfills. Since the Anoka County Landfill meets the FAA <br />definition of an airport hazard, it becomes the airport sponsor's <br />responsibility to prevent the construction, and alteration of an <br />airport hazard, and to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the <br />immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible <br />with normal airport operations including landing and takeoff of <br />aircraft. <br />City of Ramsey actions to restrict incompatible use of land near the <br />airport are: <br />1. The Airport Safety Zoning Ordinance adopted by the city in <br />198'7 . <br />Z. Conditional Use Permit between Waste Management of Minnesota <br />and the city of Ramsey which was executed on November 29, 1988. <br />The current status of the above actions are that the Airport Safety <br />Zoning Ordinance was repealed on April 19, 1988 by a city referendum. <br />The conditional use permit extends the existing landfill operating life <br />to three years with possibility for extensions limited to a maximum of <br />five years from 7anuary 1, 1989. <br />FAA will continue to work with the city of Ramsey toward resolution of <br />the landfill issue, however, before Federal funds can be used to <br />develop the airport, the existing landfill and proposed landfill (Site <br />P) incompatibility issue must be resolved to FAA's satisfaction. Our <br />preferred option is closure of the existing landfill and not having <br />Site P located near the airport. We understand that this is a complex <br />problem. This is evident by the letters from the Chairman of the Anoka <br />County Hoard of Commissioners, the law firm representing Waste <br />Management of Minnesota, and the Chair of the Metropolitan Council. <br />Based on these letters and the positions given by them, we feel that <br />the environmental review process far Site P must be completed as part <br />of our environmental approval process. <br />Page 2-2f~, Wetlands. The importance of wetlands to the nation is <br />reemphasized in Executive Order 11990, issued May P4, 1977. The <br />executive order provides that Federal agencies: <br />