Laserfiche WebLink
facility improvements maybe required to encourage system diversion from <br />overutilized to underutilized airports. <br />2. Operational Demand <br />With Alternative 2, Anoka County-Blaine will still exceed 100 percent <br />of its operational capacity by the end of the planning period (129 percent) <br />because a suitable airport is not available to accommodate all potential <br />diversion. St Paul Downtown, with the diversion of 55 based aircraft to Lake <br />Elmo, will operate at approximately 80 percent of its operational capacity by <br />2008. Crystal Airport will surpass 75 percent of its operational capacity by <br />2008. The reliever system as a whole will be operating at almost 74 percent <br />of capacity. <br />The number of total operations projected for each reliever airport, <br />after diversion occurs, is presented in Table N 5. This table also provides <br />a comparison of the number of operations at each airport to estimated ASV. <br />3. System Delay <br />With Alternative 2, total delay experienced by the reliever system will <br />surpass SS million minutes annually by the end of the planning period. This <br />level of system delay is equal to almost four minutes of average delay for each <br />aircraft operation. As with all development alternatives, average delay per <br />operation varies widely from reliever to reliever. At Anoka County-Blaine, <br />average annual delay per aircraft operation is approximately 15 minutes. By <br />diverting 55 based aircraft and their associated operations from St Paui <br />Downtown, the average delay per aircraft operation is reduced from 2.8 <br />minutes in Alternative 1(no diversion) to 1.2 minutes in Alternative 2. Both <br />Crystal and Flying Cloud airports are also expected to experience an average <br />annual delay of 1.2 minutes per operation as they approach 80 percent of their <br />operational capaaty in Alternative 2. While diversion of activity to Lake <br />Elmo will increase its average delay slightly, the reduction in delay at St. Paul <br />Downtown more than offsets this modest increase. <br />4. Preliminary System Cost <br />As with Alternative 1, Alternative 2 does not include additional rumvays <br />to increase system capacity or the addition of new airports to the reliever <br />system. Before diversion between St Paul Downtown and Lake Elmo can be <br />realized, however, airside improvements will be required at Lake Elmo. The <br />1976 master plan study for Lake Elmo recommended parallel runways for both <br />the existing primary and crosswind runway. ' While it is doubtful that the <br />operational demand at this airport will wamdnt parallel rumvays, the master <br />' Master Plan Study, Lake Elmo Airport, September 1976, R Dixon Speas Associates. <br />N-22 <br />