Laserfiche WebLink
Federal requirements <br />A significant source of funding comes .from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), <br />their priority system is described in the FAA's Airport Improvement (AIP) Handbook, <br />5100.38. ~ It ranks projects based upon seven development categories (special program, <br />reconstruction, standards, upgrading airport role, capacity development, new airports <br />capacity, new airport communities). <br />At the regional level, however, the federal ranking of projects is often not directly <br />transferable, since each airport within the system has evolved at a different pace and local <br />constraints and capabilities to implement can vary significantly. Individual airports in the <br />metropolitan azea have grown over the years to meet-changing demands such as, the number <br />of aircraft operations, lazger aircraft, increased and improved instrumentation, air-traffic and <br />safety requirements, also consideration of adjacent urban development and environmental <br />impacts. The FAA priority system reflects the needs of the national airports system and has <br />been used for guidance in establishing the regional airport system priorities. This process <br />gives a general indication of project eligibility and funding potential. <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation requirements <br /> <br />The Mn/DOT Office of Aeronautics prepazes a state-wide airports system plan (SASP) and • <br />is the federal clearing house for federally funded aviation projects. Under the state <br />channeling act all federal funding applications and disbursement of development and/or <br />planning monies must occur through Mn/DOT. The Metropolitan Council and other <br />metropolitan airport planning sponsors around the state of Minnesota coordinate the <br />development of urban azea airports with the state wide airport system plan. <br />The office of aeronautics is involved in coordination and funding decisions concerning <br />individual airport development projects. The Metropolitan Airports Commission and other <br />airport owner/operators also coordinate with the state on an individual airport basis. A <br />primary program objective is to ensure that all necessary airport projects are included in the <br />National Plan of Integrated Airport development projects. This is the means by which all <br />projects can be assessed for wmpliance with federal and state requirements and eligibility <br />for funding. The NPIAS and other threshold criteria have been defined in other portions of <br />this report. <br />Metropolitan Airports Commission requirements <br />The. MAC owns and operates most of the regions reliever airports and is responsible for <br />their developments, day-today operation and management. System wide development <br />priorities help establish the direction and general timing of need for the aviation system. <br />The Council uses this as a guide to review the MAC annual and five year Capital <br />Improvement Program (CIP). The MAC's 1989-1990 CIP was used to aid in development • <br />of individual airport development estimates for the reliever study. Elements of the CIP are <br />defined as follows: <br />