Laserfiche WebLink
5050.4 <br />3/21/80 <br />(c) If relocation of any business (including farm operations) <br />is involved, the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition <br />Policies Act of 1970 requires that the owner be offered assistance in finding <br />a location and reestablishing the business. Evidence to this effect shall be <br />included,in the environmental assessment. If the business relocation will <br />create a severe economic hardship on the community, additional analysis is <br />required in an environmental impact statement. <br />(d) If the proposal would result in alteration of surface <br />transportation patterns or otherwise divide or disrupt established communities <br />or orderly, planned development, such disruption shall not be considered <br />significant unless there is a noticeable increase in congestion or access time <br />to community facilities, recreation areas, or places of residence or business <br />or other disruption which cannot be prevented or minimized. The environmental <br />assessment shall document, to the extent applicable, measures taken to avoid <br />significant disruption by such means as rerouting, street widening, or changes <br />in land use patterns to minimize the effects of the project. <br />(e) The environmental assessment shall reflect the results of <br />any consultation with local officials or with relocation or other social <br />agencies or community groups regarding the social impacts of the proposed <br />action. <br />(4) Induced Socioeconomic Impacts. For major airport development <br />proposals there is the potential for induced or secondary impacts on surround- <br />ing communities. When such potential exists, the environmental assessment <br />shall describe in general terms such factors as shifts in patterns of popula- <br />tion movement and growth, public service demands, and changes in business and <br />economic activity to the extent influenced by the airport development. <br />Induced impacts will normally not be significant except where there are also <br />significant impacts in other categories, especially noise, land use or direct <br />social impacts. In such circumstances, a more thorough analysis of induced <br />effects may be needed in an environmental impact statement. <br />(5) Air Quality. <br />(a) Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 <br />states in part that no Federal agency shall engage in, support in any way or <br />provide financial assistance for, license or permit, or approve any activity <br />which does not conform to a State Implementation Plan after it has been <br />approved or promulgated under section 110. The Act requires that, in develop- <br />ing the Plan, the states must designate all areas as Nonattainment for those <br />pollutants which do not meet air quality standards and as Prevention of <br />Significant Deterioration for those pollutants which do currently meet <br />standards but are controlled to prevent further significant deterioration <br />beyond acceptable limits. State Implementation Plans may include one or <br />more Transportation Control Plans approved by the metropolitan planning <br />organization(s). It is FAA's responsibility to assure that Federal airport <br />actions conform to state Plans for controlling areawide air pollution impacts. <br />Page 32 <br />Chap 5 <br />Par 47 <br />