Laserfiche WebLink
5050.4 <br />3/21/80 <br />3 If the application of the criteria in 36 C.F.R. <br />Part 800.3(a) indicates an effect on properties, the Criteria of Adverse <br />Effect (36 C.F.R. 800.3(b)) shall be applied. If it is determined and the <br />State Historic Preservation Officer agrees that there would be no adverse <br />effect, supporting documentation for a Determination of No Adverse Effect as <br />specified in 36 C.F.R. 800.13(a) together with the written views of the State <br />Historic Preservation Officer. shall be forwarded tothe Advisory Council on <br />Historic Preservation for review'by the Executive Director. Unless an <br />objection is noted by the Executive Director within 30 days of receipt of <br />adequate documentation, such documentation shall be included in the environ- <br />mental assessment and no further analysis is needed. Disagreement on the <br />Determination of No Adverse Effect between the sponsor and the State Historic <br />Preservation Officer or the Advisory Council shall be referred to the FAA for <br />resolution as provided for in 36 C.F.R. 800.6(a)(2)., <br />4 If an adverse effect on properties is indicated, a <br />Determination of Adverse Effect shall be included in the environmental assess- <br />ment with supporting documentation. A preliminary case report shall be <br />prepared as specified in 36 C.F.R. 800.13(b), either as part of the environ- <br />mental assessment or as a separate document, and submitted to the FAA for the <br />Advisory Council's consultation process. It cannot be assumed that impacts <br />are insignificant on properties in or eligible for inclusion in the National <br />Register of Historic Places. Further consultation and analysis under the <br />guidance of the FAA will be necessary as described in paragraph 85h. <br />(c) Following are the requirements under the Archeological and <br />Historic Preservation Act of 1974. <br />1 If no information is made available through the <br />National Register of Historic Places, the State Historic Preservation Officer, <br />the A-95 review, or other persons or organizations with expertise that there <br />is reason to believe that significant scientific, prehistoric, historic, <br />archeological, or paleontological resources will be lost or destroyed by the <br />proposed action, no further analysis under this Act is needed for the <br />environmental assessment. It may be assumed that there would be no impact on <br />such resources. <br />2 If the above consultation indicates the need for a <br />professional resource survey of the area to be impacted, the airport sponsor <br />shall contact the FAA for advice as described under subparagraph (b)1 above. <br />If a survey is performed and indicates no significant resources within the <br />area, the results of the survey shall be documented in the environmental <br />assessment. The survey itself shall be appended to the environmental assess- <br />ment or referenced if it is voluminous. No further analysis is necessary to <br />show that the impact is not significant. <br />3 If consultation and/or a survey are inconclusive with <br />regard to the location of resources or the significance of resources, the <br />airport sponsor may include a commitment in the environmental assessment to <br />Page 40 <br />Chap 5 <br />Par 47 <br />