Laserfiche WebLink
value of each building to be sold. The Sponsor <br />should first attempt to dispose of the buildings by <br />public sale. <br />a. Competitive Bids. Competitive biddings should <br />be obtained through public auction or sealed bids <br />whenever practicable. Established acceptable ad- <br />vertising and bidding procedures should be utilized <br />and acceptance or rejection of the high bid should <br />be subject to approval by the Sponsor. Strict ac- <br />counting and fiscal controls must be incorporated <br />in the sale procedures and provisions made for ade- <br />quate performance by the successful bidder. Experi- <br />ence indicates greater benefits are generally received <br />when: <br />(1) There has been adequate advertising of the <br />sale; <br />(2) The sale includes a sufficient number of <br />structures to attract buyer interest but not <br />so many as to glut the market; <br />(3) The buyers are afforded an opportunity to <br />bid on individual buildings or on the basis <br />of taking the entire group offered for sale <br />with the Sponsor retaining the right to ac- <br />cept bids in the manner that will yield the <br />maximum return to the public. <br />b. Negotiated Private Sale. Only when a build- <br />ing fails to sell at public sale should a negotiated <br />private sale of the property be considered. In such <br />instances the reasons for the private sale should be <br />documented and the sale approved by the Sponsor. <br />c. Contract Obligation. Upon acceptance of suc- <br />cessful bidders, the Sponsor should follow up to see <br />that all conditions of the sales contract are met. <br />The cost of removal of portions of improvements <br />left by a former owner or purchaser who strips the <br />improvements of all salvable material, forfeits his <br />bond and leaves the Sponsor to remove the shell <br />by force account, demolition contract or as an item <br />in the general contract are not eligible ADAP/ <br />FAAP project costs. To do so would result in <br />duplicate reimbursement to the Sponsor for the re- <br />moval of the buildings. The solution would appear <br />to be to increase the amount of the bond required <br />of the purchaser to where it would cover the cost <br />of the removal of the shell should the purchaser <br />forfeit the bond. <br />135. DEMOLITION. It may be necessary to <br />remove improvements not disposed of by sale prior <br />to the use contemplated when the land was acquired. <br />Preferably, such clearance should be through a <br />separate demolition contract. <br />74 <br />a. Sponsor Obligation. For p roper disposal of <br />remaining improvements on the project site prior <br />to construction or use for whi ch acquired, the <br />Sponsor should: <br />(1) Obtain or prepare an estimate of the cost <br />of demolition; <br />(2) Using accepted contracting procedures, ad- <br />vertise and solicit bids for the proposed <br />demolition; <br />On the basis of Sponsor's estimate of demoli- <br />tion cost, recommend appropriate action on <br />acceptance of bid to the appropriate FAA <br />official if such work is covered by an ADAP/ <br />FAAP project; <br />(4) After an award of contract, perform inter- <br />mediate and final construction inspections to <br />assure compliance with contract provisions. <br />b. Timeliness of Clearance. The Sponsor should <br />implement procedures to insure that permanently <br />vacated residential improvements are removed or <br />otherwise committed to protective use as early as <br />practicable after they are vacated. This procedure <br />would insure the prompt clearance or protection of <br />nonresidential improvements to avoid vandalism <br />or illegal uses. The prompt clearance of vacated <br />residential improvements where there is no possibil- <br />ity of the premises being reoccupied is necessary <br />to reduce the cost to an acceptal de level as well as <br />to protect the public's interest as a matter that <br />involves public safety, esthetics, neighborhood <br />preservation and public health. <br />c. Demolition Contract. Such contracts should <br />be of a size to develop the maximum competition in <br />bidding. <br />(1) Bid proposals should provide for showing <br />plus or minus bids on each structure to be in- <br />cluded in the demolition contract. Only in <br />this manner can the Sponsor be reasonably <br />certain it is receiving credit for any salvage <br />values the buildings may have. <br />(2) Except in unusual circumstances, there <br />should be no restriction placed on the method <br />used by the contractor to clear the improve- <br />ment other than local ordinance or other <br />statutory requirements. <br />d. Demolition by Project Construction Contrac- <br />tor. Only when other methods of disposition and <br />clearance fail, or are not feasible, should demolition <br />of improvements be included as a part of the air- <br />port construction contract. In this event, the Spon- <br />sor should furnish the building description, location <br />(3) <br />• <br />• <br />