My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Airport Master Plan November 1984
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Airport Commission
>
Miscellaneous
>
Airport Master Plan November 1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2014 12:40:52 PM
Creation date
5/18/2010 8:48:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 7 <br />Mr. Otto replied that the type of aircraft allowed is limited to that which <br />the primary runway allows for. <br />1'. <br />Jim Martin - Stated he owns 100 acres in Ramsey and inquired as to how far <br />' out the airport 'C' would go. <br />Mr. Otto replied that the City goes out 14 miles from the airport property <br />edge and that 'C' zone is a height limitation rather than a density limitation. <br />Mr. Martin stated that he has had some experience with industrial property <br />and airports and that some cities pay for easements and some cities steal <br />' easements by zoning. If the city creates a 'C' zone, the ongoing cost of <br />keeping trees below a certain height would be the responsibility of the <br />property owner unless the city acquires the land fair and square. Mr. Martin <br />stated that he is sure cities limit densities in 'C' zones. <br />Mr. Harry Nemac stated that 'C' zones cover height limitations only. <br />' Mr. Otto stated that cities do have the perrogative to make additional <br />restrictions beyond those that are required. <br />' <br />Mr. Martin inquired as to the noise level. <br />-Mr. Otto replied that the noise will bother some more than others, but there <br />' is not going to be a noise problem with the number of operations at Gateway, <br />we are not even required to do a noise test unless you are expecting a jet <br />operation /day or 90,000 operations per year. <br />Chairman Ippel stated that PCA will be doing a footprint noise level test <br />at Gateway. <br />Sharon Mager - 7260 152nd Lane - Requested a definition of A and B zones. <br />Mr. Otto stated that the A zone is the approach area equal to 2/3 of the runway <br />length. In other words, no development would be allowed within 2200' and <br />existing structures can be grandfathered in. This zone is 200' longer than <br />what the Clear Zone is. The Clear Zone is a 2000' trapezoid shape off the <br />end of the runway. The first 1000' has to be acquired and this is also <br />recommended for the second 1000', but this cannot always be realized. In <br />the B.zone, development, density and use are restricted. That length is 1/3 <br />the runway length; an additional 1100' off the end of the runway. Any <br />residential development in this zone would have a minimum lot size of 3 acres. <br />Jim Corbin - 14960 Uranimite - Inquired as to when the airport construction <br />would be complete and sewer and water brought in if the City decides to have <br />an airport. <br />Mr. Otto replied that the airport is located in an industrial area and it <br />would seem that one day the City would need sewer and water there. <br />Mr. Corbin - Inquired if the airport requires sewer and water. <br />Mr. Otto replied that it does not today and it would depend on the quality <br />of water and septic systems; it is possible that the airport would not <br />require sewer and water. <br />Mr. Koshak stated that this issue will be studied as the Master Plan progresses <br />and noted that the terminal area itself is not dependent on having sewer and <br />water to it. <br />AP /May 16, 1984 <br />Public Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.