Laserfiche WebLink
stage of that plan addresses whether or not it is technically feasible to <br />develop an airport over a 20 year time period at the Gateway site that would <br />qualify for State and Federal funding; it also includes preliminary cost <br />estimates for that airport development. Several special public meetings and an <br />airport open house were conducted in order to pursue public input, concerns and <br />comments. For one of those public meetings in particular, a special letter of <br />invitation, in addition to normal publication, was sent to those property <br />owners potentially affected ty airport development. Several members of this <br />Airport Commission and City Council also toured airport facilities in the <br />region that were similar to what could be developed in Ramsey. <br />Harland Otto stated that the Metro Region Airport System Plan is under the <br />guidance of the Metro Council and implemented by the Metro Airports Commission. <br />The metro system includes Mpls./St. Paul International, 6 additional reliever <br />airports, South St. Paul Municipal and 4 private facilities. Gateway North is <br />the northwesterly most facility, is identified in the regional system plan but <br />because it is privately owned they cannot assure it will always to there to <br />acoanodate the demand as the region grows. <br />Mr. Otto stated that Gateway North predominantly serves single and light twin <br />engine aircraft. In 1979-80 there were 30 aircraft based at Gateway; over the <br />years and largely due to the general economy, that number decreased to 12 <br />aircraft in 1984; at the time of the Airport Commission's survey, there were 16 <br />based aircraft. Assuring the airport is improved, it is expected that re <br />will be a f uctuation ip based aircraft over the next several yearsrw <br />constructio Zvi y. sesed irport; after construction is completed there <br />would be a quick rebound of aircraft to match that of 1979; over the 20 3 <br />year period, 50 based aircraft is projected with possibly 10% of those aircraft <br />being multi -engine aircraft. Mn/Dot feels these projecttions are on the high <br />side. <br />Mr. Otto stated that the number of operations in 1979 was 46,400; this is an <br />estimate and believed to be on the high side considering the number of based <br />aircraft at that time. Mr. Otto stated that the plan projects a mid -range <br />estimate of 38,000 annual operations at the end of that 20 year time period. <br />Mr. Otto stated that Gateway would be a Basic Utility Stage II facility with a <br />minimum runway of 3300', non -precision approaches and land acquisition to <br />accommodate clear zone requirements. <br />Mr. Otto then made a slide presentation of the 3 airport layout plans that were <br />considered. Alternate A included the same north/south runway alignment as <br />presently exists; clearances could not be achieved over Cty. Fc1. #116 and the <br />railroad; 17' of fill would have been required at the south end and 7' of fill <br />at the north end. Alternate B shifted the existing north/south runway <br />alignment north and achieves adequate runway clearances with a minimum amount <br />of fill but requires the relocation of Cty. Rd. #116. Alternate C shifted the <br />primary runway away from the north/south alignment which did benefit the <br />residents but required the closing of Cty. Rd. #56 at the existing intersection <br />of Cty. Rd. #116; the primary runway would be 3300' in a east/west alignment <br />but the loss of wind coverage requires a second runway; this alternate was <br />defeated because it would require closing Cty. Rd. #56 and the limited amount <br />of airport funds makes it difficult to develop an airport with a crosswind <br />August 21, 1985 <br />Page 2 of 14 <br />