My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/22/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 04/22/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:47:52 PM
Creation date
8/29/2003 11:54:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/22/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> o <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />.14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />That the proposed rezoning is located within the Metropolitan Urban Semice Area (MUSA) <br />boundary. <br /> <br />That the Subject Property is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and the <br />surrounding adjacent properties are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. <br /> <br />That the development will include single-family homes and association-maintained <br />cottages. <br /> <br />That the development is proposing to deviate from City Ordinances in the following <br />manner; smaller lot sizes and narrower lot widths for the urban-single family lots than <br />required, reduced building setbacks than required, narrower road right-of-way than <br />required, narrower constructed street widths, and the exclusive use of private streets <br />through the association-maintained cottages. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is proposing to have 64% private open space as part of the development, <br />which exceeds the 50% requirement for private open space required under City Ordinances. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is proposing a high quality of design and design compatible with <br />surrounding land uses, both existing and planned. <br /> <br />That a wider range of housing types, price ranges and styles than could be accomplished <br />under existing zoning is being proposed. <br /> <br />That the proposed public amenities, facilities and open spaces are greater than the <br />minimum requirements of existing zoning and determined to be in the public good. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is proposing a development that is compatible with the purposes and <br />intents of this Zoning Chapter and the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will not exercise any substantial detrimental influence on <br />the market value of surrounding properties. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will show a favorable economic impact on the community <br />at large. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will not adversely impaCt natural features such as wetlands, <br />water features, woodlands, and steep slopes. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will protect and preserve Scenic qualities to the greatest <br />extent possible. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will not impose any undue burden on public services and <br />facilities, including fire and police protection, schools, streets, water systems, sanitary <br />sewer Systems and storm sevger systems. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #03-02-055 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />-207- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.