Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer asked if the reason Mr. Brand brought this up is because o:£:~e' p~ib~ility <br />of running a street through his property. ~?:,i!?'~ <br />Mr. Brand indicated he may be open to that, as he bought the land for inve~[~enti':';i ~: <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded 'by Commissioner Reeve t~:i'i~p, prove th~s~ch plan <br />contingent on compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated March 28,"2003 and reco~end <br />that the developer proceed to the preliminary plat stage, sul~j'~at~!"to staff ~etermining if'i~'iis <br />permissible to vacate parkland to address egress issues and:~-~ le~:,i:took at reconfiguration <br />170~" Avenue to reduce the impact on Mr. Diedfich'spmp.~erty. ..... ' <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Chairperson Nixt stated he algo:wanted to ~irect staff that pr/vate propdrty <br />should not be taken and they should look at par~and~ for accesSi~UrPoses. Associate Planner <br />Wald asked if the Commissioners wanted to'"give '~:'~hmmem~'i~.:i;~fi~.the-i~- cluster development <br />discussed by the City Council. She stated the Council's iidea~-~as to recommend cluster homes <br />until someday When 'urban services are extended t° that are~'~.?'i(i~0mmissioner Johnson stated he <br />would recommend going forward With the current plan. 'r:¢5¢.. ' i}}.:,;::¢ <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes:'. ::::c~'a/*erson Nixt, Commission?e~i?7~son, Reeve, Brauer, <br />Shepherd, Van Scoy and Watson. :VotingNc~} ~None. Absent: Noner <br /> <br />Case #4 Review Proposed Amendments. !o Chap~e[..? (Zoning and Subdivision of <br /> Land), Section 9.50 (Sfi~divisi0i~):' <br /> <br />Presentation ~:il :': <br />Chairperson Nixt opened'the public hearing at 8:0g p.m. <br /> <br />Pr/ncipal Planner Trudgeon noted at the las~!~eting the Commission went over the ordinance, <br />and this is the public hearing potion. He~gt~ted they are hoping for a recommendation to move <br />this forward to the city:C0uncii. ~':':' '1:37:ili <br /> <br />~ :..,~. Consultant Gordon. proceeded, to go through the changes that resulted from the last meeting. <br /> <br /> Mr. GOrdon indicatedi'those were the only comments from the last review meeting. He asked if <br /> the Commission had any additional questions. <br /> <br /> Chairpersor~ Nixt asked if there are any particular areas Mr. Gordon feels have been sig-nificantly <br /> reworked'and~.could be difficult making the transition. <br /> <br />· '~:·"~·i.~i,. Mr. Gordon~ Stated there were not really any policy issues, adding that what comes through are <br /> · i.!· engineering requirements at various levels of platting. He stated these requirements are already <br /> :·:bei.ng. practiced, this just makes it part of the ordinance. <br /> <br /> . Chairperson Nixt asked if any requirements had been eliminated. <br /> <br />Mr. Gordon stated this has been an additive process to the code, not an elimination process. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 3, 2003 <br /> Page 8 of 13 <br /> <br />-249- <br /> <br /> <br />