Laserfiche WebLink
Case# ~. ~~ <br />ADOPT ORDINANCE TO AMEND CITY CODE CHAPTER 117 ARTICLE II DIVISION 8 ENTITLED <br />SIGNS <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Associate Planner <br />Background: <br />On July 13, 2010, the City Council introduced an ordinance to amend the City's sign regulations. <br />Temporary signs are defined as signs which are erected or displayed for a limited period of time and not <br />affixed to a state building code approved structure. A sign is considered temporary if it is not intended to <br />remain on the property permanently and has not received a permanent sign permit and/or is not intended <br />to be constructed per the state building code. As it relates to temporary signs, the most significant <br />changes to the ordinance included allowing temporary, off-premise signs and removing permitting <br />requirements for temporary signs only. Major issues with the current temporary sign ordinance are <br />largely related to enforcement of I) location and 2) duration sign is placed on a parcel. <br />Observations: <br />Temporary signs are now permitted for a maximum of six (6) weeks per pacel (or per business on <br />multitenant business), per year, with a bonus of an additional four (4) weeks with no documented sign <br />violations within the past twelve (12) months. Temporary signs must be located fully on private property, <br />with the permission of the property owner. All properties aze limited to two temporary signs per parcel. <br />In locations where there are multiple businesses on one parcel, three signs are permitted. <br />Since removing the temporary sign permit, staffing levels have been significantly reduced, and City Staff <br />has had to refocus priorities. Staff has been unable to perform the necessary inventories and been unable <br />to uphold the burden of proof to definitively state how long these temporary signs have been located on <br />individual parcels. Other issues the City has encountered with temporary signs include placement and <br />location of temporary signs, most notably within public right-of--ways. Improper placement has negative <br />effects on public safety (visibility along roadways), maintenance (ability to maintain and clean boulevazd <br />areas), and aesthetics. <br />A temporary sign permit would be intended to state the start and end time the temporary sign will be <br />erected, and ensure proper location. The proposed ordinance would charge $25 for the first permit (per <br />year), and each subsequent permit fee would be waived for that year. At the Work Session, it was <br />discussed to require an actual Permit to be affixed to the temporary sign so any staff member could check <br />on site for a valid permit. The proposed ordinance requires that the Temporary Sign Permit is only <br />required in Business and Employment Districts; Temporary Sign Permits are not proposed to be required <br />for Residential Districts. In addition, temporary signs smaller than fifteen (15) squaze feet are also <br />exempt from permits. Regardless as to whether a permit is required or not, all temporary signs are <br />required to conform to City Code. The City will continue to address all sign complaints on a complaint- <br />basis. <br />