Agenda - Council - 07/27/2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1) Update on Comprehensive Plan Associate Planner Gladhill reviewed staff's report. Councilmember Look stated the memorandum of understanding was obvious and he was not sure why there needed to be one. He asked if the property owner had been notified. Associate Planner Gladhill responded the property gwner had been notified, but if Council would not support this, there would be no point in discussing this further with e property owner. City Administrator Ulrich stated the concern was that this Plan approval if it was not approved. Councilmember Look stated he would not vote on had to say. He noted the City did not bring this ; consult with the City about this before the eleventh Mayor Ramsey stated this was not the property should talk to her. Councilmember Elvig stated he believed` believed the City should align with the 1 was the fastest, easiest, and effective way Associate Planner Gladh' believethe~ but did have a family ber r enting her. Councilmember Looks the erty owner licensed in the Mate of Mi Mayor shou Associate to do. Gladhill Councilmemberl property owner to Councilmember it. up the Comprehensive ,knew ~ Council property owner County should he did believe staff owner c o t e City about this and he ;r and help weer out. He noted this e. He ' icated he was in favor of it. legal counsel representing her, legal representation, but he was not with getting one of the citizens to sign something they was an agreement with the City and the County only. City or the County did not own the property and he wanted the not think the property owner should have to pay for anything. Planner Manager Miller responded the only intent on meeting with the property owner was for staff to ensure the property owner would be protected by the MOU. It was Council's consensus to bring have staff talk to the property owner and bring this back to the Council at a future meeting.