Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />MRCCA Work Group Meeting Summary <br />Second Round of Meetings Held June 21 - June 24, 2010 <br />July 23, 2010 <br />In early June, the DNR and National Park Service completed a first draft of potential districts for <br />the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA). The MRCCA rulemaking work groups met sep- <br />arately in 3 -hour meetings throughout the 72 mile corridor to provide feedback and suggestions on <br />the draft districts. The group meetings were: <br />• Southeast Work Group met June 21St at Cottage Grove City Hall <br />• Urban East Work Group met June 22nd at Lilydale City Hall <br />• Urban West Work Group met June 23'd at City of Lakes Building, Minneapolis <br />• Northwest Work Group met June 24th at Brooklyn Park City Hall <br />The meetings were led by DNR project staff Jeff Berg and Jenny Shillcox, accompanied by DNR <br />area hydrologists, Steve Johnson, Resource Stewardship Chief of the National Park Service (NPS), <br />and other NPS staff. A total of 56 work group members attended, with various observers attend- <br />ing as well. <br />District Map Information Provided <br />The meetings focused on draft districts. As part of its rulemaking directive, the 2009 Legislature re- <br />quired the DNR to establish new districts for the MRCCA. Working under contract with the DNR, the <br />NPS developed proposed draft districts and maps of district boundaries. Steve Johnson guided the <br />participants through the processes used to develop the district descriptions and maps. <br />Layers of Geographic Information System (GIS) data were used to map the following features: soils, <br />land cover, regionally significant natural resource areas, rare natural features (including plants, mus- <br />sels, fish), open space opportunities, native plant communities, biodiversity significance, 2005 exist- <br />ing land use, 1979 land use, cultural resource elements, recreational facilities, existing zoning, de- <br />sired future conditions derived from local comprehensive plans, geologic resources, existing condi- <br />tions, and topography. Added to this mostly geographic -based information were the goals of the <br />MNRRA Plan, and goals of the Critical Area Executive Order 79-19. Since scenic values data are li- <br />mited, the NPS convened a workshop to conduct a rapid assessment to describe the visual characte- <br />ristics of 21 separate segments comprising the entire river corridor. <br />The NPS used the data and maps to search for common characteristics among different MRCCA <br />stretches. Through this process, 10 potential district types were identified and mapped, each ap- <br />pearing multiple times throughout the corridor. Participants were provided with a copy of a large <br />scale MRCCA-wide proposed district map as well as detailed maps for their work group area. <br />Proposed District Feedback Provided <br />Work group members provided excellent feedback on the district descriptions and boundaries, in- <br />cluding new information, corrections and observations. Comments varied from the appropriate- <br />ness of district designation for a specific site, to how entire districts fit into the landscape. <br />Common Issues Corridor -Wide <br />Common recommendations from all four work groups included: provide statements of intent for <br />districts; better define the districts to inform the standards; accommodate changing land owner- <br />MRCCA Rulemaking Project - June Work Group Meetings Report - July 23, 2010 <br />