My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/24/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council - 08/24/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:43:58 PM
Creation date
8/19/2010 3:08:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/24/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Specific District Comments Proposed <br />■ Does 'standard building height' mean the height that is allowed under the <br />community's zoning ordinance? <br />■ As written, this district seems to imply+ that the properties would be regulated <br />under the community's zoning ordinance and no additional restrictions would be <br />applied. Is that correct? <br />F. Highly urbanized mixed -ase lards are a part of the trrlran fabric of .the <br />community. In nparian areas, shoriefine vegetation should Lie preserved or <br />reestablished and stormwater management will he required. These areas <br />may include urban pork lands and institutions Public access to the riverbank <br />should be maintained or provided where practical. <br />• Private access should be allowed where appropriate. <br />• How will the stormwater management required be different than what is <br />currently required? <br />• Will shoreline vegetation management limit the use of urban parr lands? <br />• Should add language (similar to]) that includes opportunities to view the river. <br />■ Will this district allow the development cf commercial uses? <br />9 Commercial recreational uses should be allowed and encouraged, <br />G. River -dependent industry has.3 place an the Mississippi and is <br />protected by E f] 70-I9. It is not possible to ship commoditfes without <br />altering the riverbank Stornmwater should still be properly managed. <br />• Wculd stormwater management be covered under existing regulations? <br />H Industry that dues trot depend on cornmercial na vibration is not as <br />pre valent along the river as it once was, but remains part of the riverfront <br />community. water management is imp ortan t, and slrorefifye vegeta Non <br />should be preserved of reestablished where possible. <br />■ Gould the shoreline be managed by means other than vegetation? <br />P Would stormwater management be covered under existing regulations? <br />L Townships in the MRCCA are primarily aural with natural areas, open <br />spare and agriculture predominating. Heights on non-agricultural buildings <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.