Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> <br />River Plaza, wb_/ch, is a multi-tenant retail center that houses approx/mately 14 different <br />businesses. The property currently contains a 91 square 'foot per side freestanding pylon sign (for <br />an aggregate surface area of 182 square feet). Bob Muller is requesting additional sig,2 space of <br />54 square feet per side, in order to install a reader board onto the e~st/ng pylon sign. The <br />aggegate surface area of the proposed sig, n would be 290 square feet. The applicant has stated <br />the need for additional signage is to provide adequate advertising space for all 14 tenants. The <br />installation of the reader board will not cause the sign to exceed the 25- sign height <br />restr/ction established in City Code. The 100 square feet sign space may be <br />inadequate fbr strip malls or multi-tenant buildings. She noted the cfion will likely <br />be changed in the Chapter 9 rewrite. City Staff recommends uest to exceed <br />the sign size restriction. <br /> <br />Commission Business ~ ~ <br /> <br />Motion by Comm/ssioner Kociscak, seconded by CornmS:s~f6her Job to recommend <br />City Council adopt findings of fact relating to Bob M~i}'~';( -'request use permit <br />to exceed pylon sign size restrictions established in City '~,,. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson NLX~ Johnson, and Brauer. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners.' :Sweet, and <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Ko?iscak, second~!B;y Co ~rauer;'to recommend that City <br />Council approve Bob Mullers request to exd~d,~ sim:~;~:::'7~ s based on the findings, of <br /> <br />Motion Carried. V.~!?Yes: C~.~}5~rperson ~ Commissioners Kociscak, Zrauer, and <br />Koc/scak. Voting No:ri~%e. Absen~7~omm/ssion~!;:Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />Case #6: Requ;'s~'~°; Rezoii;':~'a;;~¢~g'~diJ~i~at of Sunflower Ridge from B4 <br /> Business;~JR~3;;~ban Residential; Case of Oakwood Land:Development <br /> <br />Chairp.~n'Nix~"~I~e~z~he re~:portion of the Ptanning Commission meeting at 8:56 p.m. in <br />orde~m' Call the publi~:'h~g <br /> <br />PUb~eiHearing '~:~: <br /> <br />Chairpersoa.'~ixt calle¢(~e public hearing to order, at 8:56 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation ":"?:.;::i":2i:;!3 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated Oakwood Land Development is requesting a <br />rezomng of property proposed to be platted as Sunflower Kidge from B-I Business and B-2 <br />Business to R-3 Urban Residential. The rezonmg will facilitate development of the subject <br />propen'y with multiple family dwelling un/ts not to exceed a density, of 7 un/ts per acre. The <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 2, 2002 <br /> Page 8 of 22 <br /> <br />-209- <br /> <br /> <br />