Agenda - Council - 05/28/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I ,I '1 Commission Business Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order at 9:04 Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to City Council approve the preliminary plat for Sunflower Ridge gent rezoning to R-3 Urban Residential and compliance with City 2002. of the dated Apr/1 24~ Motion Can/ed. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, CommSssioners Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Reeve, SWeet, and.~S~n, Case #8: Request for Site Plan Review of Development Presentation Community Development Director Frolik,!~;Oakwood Land >pment has applied for a site plan review of a [26-unit townhome located in the west of T.H. ~,t7 and north of Alpine Ddve?/~. 18.6 acres in size; 18. l acres exclusive of the wetland. Th~i~'te townhouse units wh/ch equates to a net density of 6.p;~,m~per acre. with new multiple family street olicy, there is at least oa~i!~:a~::~lic sU rovidino access throu?,e,h the ~lat, with private driveway collecmr'~:e'~tendinK:~f-f the pubK~istreets. The proposed townhome structures are a combination o£.~dard and lo~ut gade ~}~at will be finished with maintenance free siding, asphalt sh/r~gr~, masoru-~:~k'accents,~ an~;~aintenance fiche, decks (some units will have sunrooms rather:~dec ~i s lot coverage to o5%. Lot coverage on the subject prop%,~, will be'~:a'~r"~ately 15%.. Ai'i of the units will contain 2 bedrooms and all have the.,t~6l~t~e~'for a 3~oom. The finished floor areas are apprordmateiy 1,350 square feet, w,~'~4~'c-~:d~S~ ~,,Cod4~':~g~/~ements. The current draft of the medium density residential deve~0¢ent perfbrm'~:stand~}~'~oposes a 30 foot structure setback from plat boundaries aa~,;;,~]t $ foot separation'~een b~{'Idings. The buildings in SunfloWer Kidge are proposed to be':~,~3,5 feet away fro~!at boundaries and all structures are at least ~0 feet apart The structures:on the pnYate ~eway collectors meet the _5 foot setback from back of curb. The structures~4:~,front o~pubhc streets are subject to a ~5 foot setback from the r/ght-of-way; the site plarr-'i~;~ep0~g'~'k 3O foot setback from rig2t-of-way and the developer received a 5 foot variance. The"'~;~eet the minimum square footage required under City Ord/nances. City code requires a Pff'tbot wide screened buffer area when multiple family developments abut a single family d/strict. The develop.er ~s proposing a combination of landscaping and a 4-foot berm along the west side of the development. The developer has submitted a Landscape Plan which is generally acceptable. The Parks supervisor has reviewed the plan and he has noted the requirement of 1 tree per unit has been met. He suggested an additional 44 trees be added if the Planning Commission/May 2~ 2002 Page 11 of 22 -231-