Laserfiche WebLink
-254- <br /> <br />bufr%r is included, in order to meet the Code. Grading and Utility Plans will be reviewed as part <br />of the preliminary, plat process. Sidewalks are being provided on one side of all of the public <br />streets and a trail will be constructed parallel to )alpine Drive, along the entire south boundary of <br />the plat. Staff is recommending site plan approval contingent upon compliance with City Staff <br />review letter dated April 24, 2002. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Johnson questioned whether both berm and trees could be use~ <br /> <br /> Community Development Director Frolik stated buffering can inc .[ud~f!~'~'comb~at/on~* of berm, <br /> fence and trees. She explained this de elopment ~s adjacent to.s'm, gte famzt7 hom~s~.and more <br /> trees are needed as a buffer. She said the number 44 mentioned~.'~i~r is negotiable. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated a comprehensive landscape pl~:':~;:.;~Oeing considered, in the Ch~f' 9 <br />rewrite. He Juggested [t is appropriate to consider the ~an~'cape mateff~.lS'bin~ proposed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated he is satisfied with a lot:'tOif-ba~g being used, thou~ he <br />thought a 4-foot berm could be adequate. .,:? ~.~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Kociscak indicated the berm;i/~'~i~'cF:b~:~ fe~t. <br /> <br />Community, Development Director FroIik reit&areal ~:¢~ffering:'iCould be a combination of <br />fence, berm and trees, but it shou[dreaclx 5 feet2::~': . <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnsor~ suggested S'~, work wittk,~e developer on the issue of materials used <br /> <br />M_r. Peterson stated he~ had. s~i~Cm 4~k~ with the neighbors regarding buffering. He <br />noted it is in the develop-errs;Scsi'interest ro ensure adequate screemng is in place. <br /> <br />Comm~SU~od~'r~'jbtmS'o-n: quesff~e~._whether the developer had issues with regard to the Staff <br /> <br />M~:.~'~erson said they dici~aat. <br /> <br />Motion b?CommissionerJ0hnson, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, ro recommend that the <br />City Councr~!approv~the site plan for Sunflower Pddge contingent upon the issue of screemng to <br />be resolved wftl~ S:taff/and upon compliance with City Staff review letter dated April 24, 2002. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, and Brauer. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May '~., 2002 <br /> Page 12 of <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />