My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/28/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 05/28/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:08:01 AM
Creation date
9/2/2003 3:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/28/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
323
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· City's interests would be protected because all projects would be mn through a City Eng/neer <br /> rather than having the City En~o-ineer deal with the respective engineer of the project. <br /> <br />Disadvantages <br />· Timing - the housing development would become cumbersome because the public process is <br /> generally slower than the private process. <br />· There would be a significant need for additional staffing in the Enghneering Department. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman explained that the City Engineer requested that the Council consider <br />another option. Consider the possibility of the City hiring a consultant to perform the desig, n of <br />the project. With the City acting as the employer of the consultant, Ramsey would more easily <br />assure the City's interests are being protected. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if in the past when the developer'did the actual <br />improvements themselves did they- not require a bond of 150 percent of the cost of the <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Community Development Frolik replied that whether it is a public or private project they have to <br />bond 125 percent of the cost as well as enough money to cover the cost of the inspector. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if the City would have to hold a public hearing in regards to 'selling <br />bonds for the project. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied yes. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if it would impact the City's bond indebtedness. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied no, explaining that they would be using revenue bonds. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that if the City does the work he sees it building a very large eng/neering <br />department. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if when staff meets with a developer is it billed against <br />their account. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that when a private developer does the work there is a <br />tendency to take short cuts. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired as to when that has happened in the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman replied that there was an issue in the Apple Ridge development. <br /> <br />City Council/May 6, 2002 <br />Page 7 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.