Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy, to recommend that City <br />Council adopt the resolution adopting Findings of Fact favorable to the applicant's request <br />relating to the City of Ramsey HRA's request for an interim use permit to deviate from sign <br />restrictions established in City Code. <br />Further Discussion <br />Discussion ensued regarding Findings of Fact Number 20. <br />Motion amended by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy to recommend <br />that City Council adopt the resolution adopting Findings of Fact favorable to the applicant's <br />request relating to the City of Ramsey HRA's request for an interim use permit to deviate from <br />sign restrictions established in City Code with an additional finding to read "That the proposed <br />sign is part of the original signage and vision of The COR". <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners Brauer, Van Scoy, and <br />Cleveland. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Dunaway, and Rogers. <br />Motion by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy to recommend that City <br />Council adopt the resolution granting approval of an interim use permit to deviate from sign <br />restrictions at 7157 Highway 10 NW, based on the Findings of Fact, and declaring terms of the <br />same. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners Brauer, Van Scoy, and <br />Cleveland. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Dunaway, and Rogers. <br />The Commission would like to suggest review of the sign ordinance specifically the billboards. <br />Case #2: Public Hearing — Request for an Interim Use Permit to Exceed Sign <br />Restrictions on the Property Located at 14550 Armstrong Blvd. NW; Case of <br />City of Ramsey HRA <br />Public Hearine <br />Chairperson Levine called the public hearing to order at 7:28 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson presented the staff report. <br />Citizen Input <br />Mr. Lazan stated they are not proposing an Architectural cap on this sign, the structure is unique <br />and the sign is likely to be removed with any reconfiguration of Armstrong Boulevard. They are <br />looking to infill the panels only on this particular sign. <br />Special Planning Commission/September 16, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />